86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 1

vs 72 JEANNETTE COLLINS & MARGARET YUILL

NS 43		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3NTE+3	-490	-1	-470	-370	-460	8 NS	4 S-1	-50	-2	10	110	0
2 NS	1 S=	80	3	-30	-10	-40	9 NS	3 N-3	-150	3	-270	-230	-420
3 NS	4 S-1	-50	1	-80	-170	-150	10 NS	1 W+1	-110	-4	30	10	10
4 NS	3 S-2	-200	-2	-140	-130	-140	11 NS	1NTW+3	-180	-3	-90	-100	-60
5 NS	3NTN+4	720	1	690	940	1230	12 NS	3 E=	-140	-1	-120	-100	-90
6 NS	4 W+3	-710	4	-860	-980	-1080	13 NS	3 S+1	170	-8	530	450	440
7 NS	3NTW+2	-660	0	-660	-660	-650	14 NS	3NTN+2	460	2	400	370	450
Net Imps -7

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 2

vs 69 ALISON FALLON & BARBARA MARRETT

EW 38		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	2 E=	110	4	50	10	110	22 EW	3 E-1	-100	-6	-160	-70	20
16 EW	3 E+3	230	4	-80	-100	-420	23 EW	4 S+1	-650	0	660	650	650
17 EW	3NTW+2	460	0	-460	-470	-460	24 EW	5 W+2	440	0	-430	-460	-430
18 EW	5 N=	-650	0	640	590	650	25 EW	1NTN+2	-150	-1	110	50	110
19 EW	3NTE=	600	-1	-640	-640	-650	26 EW	3 S+1	-130	-2	50	190	-100
20 EW	4 E-3	-300	-5	90	70	80	27 EW	2 E+3	200	-5	-390	-390	-340
21 EW	3 S=	-140	-2	90	30	-40	28 EW	4 N-1	100	4	40	-30	70
Net Imps -10

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 3

vs 62 BERENICE FOLKARD & HELEN LOWRY

NS 41		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	2 E=	-110	-1	-90	-90	-90	8 NS	2 W-2	100	-5	270	300	290
2 NS	6NTS=	1440	6	1200	950	1060	9 NS	4 E=	-620	-10	-190	-170	-320
3 NS	3NTW+2	-660	0	-670	-660	-670	10 NS	4 E+1	-650	-10	-170	-140	-120
4 NS	3NTW=	-600	-9	-230	-470	-430	11 NS	3NTW+1	-430	-6	-190	-350	-270
5 NS	2 N=	110	3	-10	-70	-140	12 NS	4 N+1	650	8	300	190	250
6 NS	4 W-6	600	12	-70	-140	20	13 NS	6 E-3	300	8	-20	10	40
7 NS	2NTW+1	-150	0	-150	-140	-100	14 NS	5 xN-2	-300	-8	20	-90	-140
Net Imps -12

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 4

vs 71 SUSAN EMERSON & JUDY HOCKING

NS 41		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	4 E+1	-450	0	-450	-410	-450	22 NS	2NTN=	120	-1	140	120	210
16 NS	2 E+2	-170	-3	-80	70	-10	23 NS	2 W+2	-130	0	-130	-110	-140
17 NS	5 N-1	-50	-9	340	400	420	24 NS	3 E=	-110	-1	-90	-80	-60
18 NS	4 S+1	650	0	650	520	640	25 NS	2 S+1	110	2	60	120	-30
19 NS	2 W=	-90	-2	-40	-80	50	26 NS	4 E=	-620	-8	-260	-230	-270
20 NS	4 W-3	300	4	170	30	140	27 NS	3NTS=	400	3	290	410	360
21 NS	5 E-2	100	5	-100	-10	-130	28 NS	2 E+2	-170	-4	-40	-70	-20
Net Imps -14

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 5

vs 74 ELIZABETH FANOS & MARGARET FOSTER

NS 44		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	4 W-1	50	11	-450	-450	-380	8 NS	3 N-1	-50	-2	10	80	90
2 NS	1NTN=	90	3	-10	-20	20	9 NS	2NTN-1	-50	-3	60	50	100
3 NS	5 S=	400	5	190	290	130	10 NS	1NTW=	-90	-3	20	60	-20
4 NS	2NTN=	120	-7	420	360	0	11 NS	2 S+1	140	0	150	120	130
5 NS	4 S+3	710	0	710	710	800	12 NS	3 E=	-110	-2	-30	-90	-130
6 NS	3NTN+2	460	3	340	460	390	13 NS	3 E=	-140	5	-330	-100	-110
7 NS	4 E+2	-680	12	-1300	-1550	-1070	14 NS	3NTN+2	460	1	430	450	450
Net Imps 23

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 6

vs 87 HELEN KITE & PADDY NAYLOR

NS 42		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	3 S+2	150	-10	620	320	350	22 NS	3 W+1	-130	11	-650	-650	-560
16 NS	3NTW-1	100	10	-370	-440	-550	23 NS	4 S=	620	4	480	470	450
17 NS	4 N-1	-50	0	-50	-60	-80	24 NS	2 S-2	-100	-1	-80	-20	-50
18 NS	3 E=	-110	-7	170	280	230	25 NS	5 E-1	100	11	-470	-230	-440
19 NS	4 S-1	-50	0	-50	-50	220	26 NS	5 N-1	-100	-7	180	40	170
20 NS	1NTE+2	-150	0	-150	-150	-140	27 NS	4 E+1	-450	0	-440	-470	-450
21 NS	3NTE+2	-460	0	-450	-450	-450	28 NS	5 N-2	-200	-8	140	60	110
Net Imps 3

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 7

vs 75 MAUREEN JAKES & ANN MELLINGS

NS 40		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3 E=	-140	-1	-120	-120	-110	8 NS	2 E+2	-170	-9	220	230	210
2 NS	3NTN=	600	10	140	390	150	9 NS	4 W+1	-150	5	-330	-330	-100
3 NS	2 N-2	-100	8	-450	-650	-500	10 NS	4 E+1	-650	0	-650	-450	-370
4 NS	4 S+2	680	3	570	760	560	11 NS	3 E+1	-130	-5	40	130	60
5 NS	5 E-2	100	5	-100	-80	-130	12 NS	5 N-1	-100	-14	910	800	720
6 NS	4 E+2	-680	13	-1430	-800	-1010	13 NS	4 N=	620	7	330	510	520
7 NS	2 E+2	-170	-1	-150	-110	-230	14 NS	5 W+1	-420	3	-520	-710	-610
Net Imps 24

______________________________________________________________________

86 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

Round 8

vs 83 MARIA GIBBS & REBECCA POON

EW 37		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	3NTS-2	200	3	-100	-130	-70	22 EW	5 N=	-400	-5	200	180	150
16 EW	4 N+1	-450	-8	100	-20	130	23 EW	1NTN+2	-150	-1	120	130	120
17 EW	3 W+1	130	-2	-210	-170	-250	24 EW	4 N=	-420	-5	210	100	90
18 EW	3 W+1	130	-5	-300	-420	-360	25 EW	2NTS-6	300	-3	-400	-410	-540
19 EW	4 E-2	-200	-5	0	-80	20	26 EW	3NTS+1	-630	-4	470	330	230
20 EW	3 E-1	-100	-4	-50	-570	-220	27 EW	3NTW+2	460	0	-470	-470	-480
21 EW	2 S+1	-140	-2	90	-110	50	28 EW	4 W+1	450	-1	-480	-480	-610
Net Imps -42

______________________________________________________________________