78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 1

vs 64 JULIA HOFFMAN & JENNY THOMPSON

NS 34		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3NTE+3	-490	-1	-470	-370	-460	8 NS	4 N-2	-100	-3	10	110	0
2 NS	2 E=	-110	-2	-30	-10	-40	9 NS	3 W=	-110	4	-270	-230	-420
3 NS	3NTW-1	100	5	-80	-170	-150	10 NS	1NTW-2	200	5	30	10	10
4 NS	3 S-2	-200	-2	-140	-130	-140	11 NS	2 N-1	-50	1	-90	-100	-60
5 NS	3NTS+3	690	0	690	940	1230	12 NS	1NTE+2	-150	-1	-120	-100	-90
6 NS	6 W+1	-1460	-12	-860	-980	-1080	13 NS	3NTS=	600	2	530	450	440
7 NS	3NTE+3	-690	-1	-660	-660	-650	14 NS	2 N+1	140	-6	400	370	450
Net Imps -11

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 2

vs 74 ELIZABETH FANOS & MARGARET FOSTER

EW 39		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	3 N=	-110	-2	50	10	110	22 EW	3NTW+1	630	10	-160	-70	20
16 EW	4 xN-1	100	1	-80	-100	-420	23 EW	5 N+1	-680	-1	660	650	650
17 EW	3NTW+3	490	1	-460	-470	-460	24 EW	3NTE=	400	-1	-430	-460	-430
18 EW	4 N+1	-650	0	640	590	650	25 EW	2 W=	110	6	110	50	110
19 EW	4 E+1	650	0	-640	-640	-650	26 EW	3 S+1	-170	-3	50	190	-100
20 EW	3 W=	140	6	90	70	80	27 EW	4 E+1	450	2	-390	-390	-340
21 EW	3NTN=	-600	-11	90	30	-40	28 EW	4 S-1	100	4	40	-30	70
Net Imps 12

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 3

vs 73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

NS 36		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	2 E=	-110	-1	-90	-90	-90	8 NS	5 N=	400	4	270	300	290
2 NS	6 N=	1430	6	1200	950	1060	9 NS	3 S-2	-100	3	-190	-170	-320
3 NS	4 W+2	-170	11	-670	-660	-670	10 NS	5 E=	-650	-10	-170	-140	-120
4 NS	3NTE=	-600	-9	-230	-470	-430	11 NS	3NTW-1	50	6	-190	-350	-270
5 NS	3 E-3	150	4	-10	-70	-140	12 NS	5 xW-1	100	-5	300	190	250
6 NS	2 E+3	-150	-2	-70	-140	20	13 NS	4 E=	-620	-12	-20	10	40
7 NS	2NTW+2	-180	-1	-150	-140	-100	14 NS	5 xW-1	100	2	20	-90	-140
Net Imps -4

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 4

vs 77 MARION SPURRIER & JAN TUNKS

EW 37		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	4 E+1	450	0	-450	-410	-450	22 EW	2NTN+3	-210	-2	140	120	210
16 EW	3 S-3	150	2	-80	70	-10	23 EW	3 W+1	130	0	-130	-110	-140
17 EW	4 N=	-420	-2	340	400	420	24 EW	2 E+1	110	1	-90	-80	-60
18 EW	4 S+1	-650	0	650	520	640	25 EW	4 N-1	50	3	60	120	-30
19 EW	Pass	0	-1	-40	-80	50	26 EW	5 E-2	-200	-10	-260	-230	-270
20 EW	4 W-1	-100	2	170	30	140	27 EW	3NTN+2	-460	-5	290	410	360
21 EW	4 N-2	200	3	-100	-10	-130	28 EW	2 W-2	-100	-4	-40	-70	-20
Net Imps -13

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 5

vs 72 JEANNETTE COLLINS & MARGARET YUILL

NS 40		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	4 E=	-420	1	-450	-450	-380	8 NS	2 S=	110	3	10	80	90
2 NS	1NTN=	90	3	-10	-20	20	9 NS	3NTN-1	-50	-3	60	50	100
3 NS	2 E=	-110	-7	190	290	130	10 NS	2 E-2	200	5	20	60	-20
4 NS	3NTN+1	630	5	420	360	0	11 NS	1NTS+1	120	-1	150	120	130
5 NS	4 S+3	710	0	710	710	800	12 NS	3 W=	-110	-2	-30	-90	-130
6 NS	3NTN+2	460	3	340	460	390	13 NS	4 W+1	-150	5	-330	-100	-110
7 NS	4 W+2	-680	12	-1300	-1550	-1070	14 NS	3NTS+1	430	0	430	450	450
Net Imps 24

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 6

vs 84 DENISE BUTTROSE & CARMEL THOMPSON

EW 37		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	5 S+2	-640	-1	620	320	350	22 EW	3NTW+1	630	-1	-650	-650	-560
16 EW	4 E-1	-100	-10	-370	-440	-550	23 EW	4 S=	-620	-4	480	470	450
17 EW	4 N-1	50	0	-50	-60	-80	24 EW	1NTN-1	50	-1	-80	-20	-50
18 EW	4 N-3	300	10	170	280	230	25 EW	3NTW-2	-200	-12	-470	-230	-440
19 EW	4 S-1	50	0	-50	-50	220	26 EW	5 E-1	-100	2	180	40	170
20 EW	2 E+1	110	-1	-150	-150	-140	27 EW	4 W=	420	-1	-440	-470	-450
21 EW	4 W+1	450	0	-450	-450	-450	28 EW	2 W-3	-150	0	140	60	110
Net Imps -19

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 7

vs 87 HELEN KITE & PADDY NAYLOR

NS 42		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	1NTN-2	-100	1	-120	-120	-110	8 NS	4 N=	420	5	220	230	210
2 NS	4 N-2	-200	-8	140	390	150	9 NS	4 S-3	-150	5	-330	-330	-100
3 NS	3NTW+1	-630	-5	-450	-650	-500	10 NS	4 E+1	-650	0	-650	-450	-370
4 NS	4 N+1	650	2	570	760	560	11 NS	3 E-1	50	0	40	130	60
5 NS	2 S=	110	5	-100	-80	-130	12 NS	5NTN=	660	-6	910	800	720
6 NS	5 E+1	-680	13	-1430	-800	-1010	13 NS	4 N-1	-100	-10	330	510	520
7 NS	3 W=	-140	0	-150	-110	-230	14 NS	4 W+2	-170	8	-520	-710	-610
Net Imps 10

______________________________________________________________________

78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 8

vs 62 BERENICE FOLKARD & HELEN LOWRY

NS 38		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	4 W-2	100	5	-100	-130	-70	22 NS	4 S=	420	6	200	180	150
16 NS	4 N+1	450	8	100	-20	130	23 NS	3 W-3	300	5	120	130	120
17 NS	5 W=	-400	-5	-210	-170	-250	24 NS	2 E-2	100	-3	210	100	90
18 NS	5 W-1	50	8	-300	-420	-360	25 NS	4 E+1	-650	-6	-400	-410	-540
19 NS	3 W-1	100	3	0	-80	20	26 NS	3NTN=	600	4	470	330	230
20 NS	4 xE=	-790	-12	-50	-570	-220	27 NS	3NTW+3	-490	-1	-470	-470	-480
21 NS	2 S+2	170	2	90	-110	50	28 NS	6 E=	-980	-11	-480	-480	-610
Net Imps 3

______________________________________________________________________