73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 1

vs 87 HELEN KITE & PADDY NAYLOR

NS 42		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3NTW+3	-490	-1	-470	-370	-460	8 NS	4 N-2	-100	-3	10	110	0
2 NS	2 E=	-90	-2	-30	-10	-40	9 NS	4 xN-2	-300	-1	-270	-230	-420
3 NS	3 E=	-140	-2	-80	-170	-150	10 NS	3 S-1	-100	-4	30	10	10
4 NS	2 N-2	-200	-2	-140	-130	-140	11 NS	1NTS-4	-200	-3	-90	-100	-60
5 NS	6 N+1	1390	12	690	940	1230	12 NS	2 W=	-110	0	-120	-100	-90
6 NS	4 W+1	-650	5	-860	-980	-1080	13 NS	4 S=	620	3	530	450	440
7 NS	3NTE+1	-630	1	-660	-660	-650	14 NS	3NTN+2	460	2	400	370	450
Net Imps 5

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 2

vs 71 SUSAN EMERSON & JUDY HOCKING

NS 37		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	3 S-2	-200	-6	50	10	110	22 NS	4 xS-1	-100	2	-160	-70	20
16 NS	5 W+1	-620	-11	-80	-100	-420	23 NS	4 S+1	650	0	660	650	650
17 NS	3NTW+4	-520	-2	-460	-470	-460	24 NS	3NTE=	-400	1	-430	-460	-430
18 NS	4 N+1	650	0	640	590	650	25 NS	1NTN=	90	-1	110	50	110
19 NS	4 E=	-620	1	-640	-640	-650	26 NS	2NTN+1	150	3	50	190	-100
20 NS	3 S=	140	2	90	70	80	27 NS	3 E+2	-200	5	-390	-390	-340
21 NS	3 N+1	130	1	90	30	-40	28 NS	3 S=	140	3	40	-30	70
Net Imps -2

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 3

vs 78 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

EW 36		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 EW	2 E=	110	1	-90	-90	-90	8 EW	5 N=	-400	-4	270	300	290
2 EW	6 N=	-1430	-6	1200	950	1060	9 EW	3 S-2	100	-3	-190	-170	-320
3 EW	4 W+2	170	-11	-670	-660	-670	10 EW	5 E=	650	10	-170	-140	-120
4 EW	3NTE=	600	9	-230	-470	-430	11 EW	3NTW-1	-50	-6	-190	-350	-270
5 EW	3 E-3	-150	-4	-10	-70	-140	12 EW	5 xW-1	-100	5	300	190	250
6 EW	2 E+3	150	2	-70	-140	20	13 EW	4 E=	620	12	-20	10	40
7 EW	2NTW+2	180	1	-150	-140	-100	14 EW	5 xW-1	-100	-2	20	-90	-140
Net Imps 4

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 4

vs 84 DENISE BUTTROSE & CARMEL THOMPSON

NS 35		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	4 W+1	-450	0	-450	-410	-450	22 NS	1NTN+2	150	0	140	120	210
16 NS	3 xS-2	-300	-6	-80	70	-10	23 NS	3 W+1	-130	0	-130	-110	-140
17 NS	4 N=	420	2	340	400	420	24 NS	3 E=	-110	-1	-90	-80	-60
18 NS	3NTN+2	660	0	650	520	640	25 NS	4 N-1	-50	-3	60	120	-30
19 NS	3 W-2	200	6	-40	-80	50	26 NS	4 W-1	100	8	-260	-230	-270
20 NS	4 W-2	200	1	170	30	140	27 NS	3NTS=	400	3	290	410	360
21 NS	3 N-2	-200	-3	-100	-10	-130	28 NS	3 E-1	50	3	-40	-70	-20
Net Imps 10

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 5

vs 69 ALISON FALLON & BARBARA MARRETT

EW 34		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 EW	4 W+1	450	0	-450	-450	-380	8 EW	3 W-1	-50	-1	10	80	90
2 EW	1NTN-1	100	3	-10	-20	20	9 EW	4 S=	-420	-8	60	50	100
3 EW	3 S+2	-150	1	190	290	130	10 EW	1NTE-2	-200	-5	20	60	-20
4 EW	2 N+2	-130	7	420	360	0	11 EW	1NTS+2	-150	0	150	120	130
5 EW	4 S+3	-710	0	710	710	800	12 EW	3 E=	110	2	-30	-90	-130
6 EW	4 S=	-420	-2	340	460	390	13 EW	5 W=	600	7	-330	-100	-110
7 EW	6 W+1	1460	4	-1300	-1550	-1070	14 EW	3NTS+1	-430	0	430	450	450
Net Imps 8

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 6

vs 66 WENDY HOOPER & SUE LUSK

EW 33		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	5 S=	-600	1	620	320	350	22 EW	6NTE-1	-100	-13	-650	-650	-560
16 EW	3NTW=	600	6	-370	-440	-550	23 EW	4 S=	-620	-4	480	470	450
17 EW	4 N-1	50	0	-50	-60	-80	24 EW	3NTS-1	50	-1	-80	-20	-50
18 EW	3 S+2	-150	1	170	280	230	25 EW	5 E-1	-100	-11	-470	-230	-440
19 EW	4 S-1	50	0	-50	-50	220	26 EW	5 xE-1	-200	-1	180	40	170
20 EW	1NTE+2	150	0	-150	-150	-140	27 EW	4 E+2	480	1	-440	-470	-450
21 EW	5 E=	450	0	-450	-450	-450	28 EW	3 N+2	-150	0	140	60	110
Net Imps -21

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 7

vs 63 CANDICE GINSBERG & BARBARA TRAVIS

EW 36		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 EW	1NTN-2	100	-1	-120	-120	-110	8 EW	3 N+1	-170	2	220	230	210
2 EW	5 N-4	400	11	140	390	150	9 EW	4 E+1	150	-5	-330	-330	-100
3 EW	3NTE+1	630	5	-450	-650	-500	10 EW	5 E=	650	0	-650	-450	-370
4 EW	4 N+2	-680	-3	570	760	560	11 EW	3 N=	-140	-3	40	130	60
5 EW	4 E-2	-100	-5	-100	-80	-130	12 EW	3NTN+2	-660	6	910	800	720
6 EW	6 E=	1430	0	-1430	-800	-1010	13 EW	2 S-2	200	11	330	510	520
7 EW	3 E+1	170	1	-150	-110	-230	14 EW	5 W+2	440	-2	-520	-710	-610
Net Imps 17

______________________________________________________________________

73 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 8

vs 72 JEANNETTE COLLINS & MARGARET YUILL

EW 39		2014 ANOT WOMENS PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	WOMENS AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	1 W+3	130	1	-100	-130	-70	22 EW	3 N+1	-130	2	200	180	150
16 EW	4 W-1	-100	0	100	-20	130	23 EW	1NTS+2	-150	-1	120	130	120
17 EW	3 W+2	150	-2	-210	-170	-250	24 EW	3 N=	-140	2	210	100	90
18 EW	3NTE+2	460	4	-300	-420	-360	25 EW	2 E+3	200	-5	-400	-410	-540
19 EW	3 E-1	-100	-3	0	-80	20	26 EW	3NTN+1	-630	-4	470	330	230
20 EW	2 E=	110	2	-50	-570	-220	27 EW	3NTW+2	460	0	-470	-470	-480
21 EW	4 N-1	100	5	90	-110	50	28 EW	6 E=	980	11	-480	-480	-610
Net Imps 12

______________________________________________________________________