112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 1

vs 99 TERRY DRIVER & DAVID SCHOFIELD

EW 55		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 EW	6NTE=	990	12	-340	-370	-460	8 EW	6 xN-2	300	7	0	110	0
2 EW	1NTE-1	-50	-2	-30	-10	-40	9 EW	4 W+1	150	0	-140	-230	-420
3 EW	4 E=	620	8	-260	-170	-150	10 EW	2 S=	-110	-3	-10	10	10
4 EW	3NTN-4	400	6	-140	-130	-140	11 EW	2 S-1	50	-2	-130	-100	-60
5 EW	6NTS=	-1440	-12	770	940	1230	12 EW	3 W-1	-50	-5	-120	-100	-90
6 EW	4 W+3	710	-8	-1040	-980	-1080	13 EW	2 S+1	-140	5	330	450	440
7 EW	4 W=	620	2	-550	-660	-650	14 EW	3NTN+1	-430	-3	330	370	450
Net Imps 5

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 2

vs 113 CATHERINE ELLICE-FLINT & MANDY PORTER

EW 50		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	3 N=	-110	-3	20	10	110	22 EW	3 S=	-140	-4	-20	-70	20
16 EW	2 N+2	-170	-11	-350	-100	-420	23 EW	4 N+1	-650	0	650	650	650
17 EW	3NTW+1	430	0	-440	-470	-460	24 EW	3NTE+1	430	0	-440	-460	-430
18 EW	3NTN+2	-660	-1	640	590	650	25 EW	2 S+1	-140	0	140	50	110
19 EW	4 E+1	650	0	-650	-640	-650	26 EW	4 S-2	200	8	120	190	-100
20 EW	3 E=	110	6	150	70	80	27 EW	3NTE+2	460	2	-410	-390	-340
21 EW	4 S-1	100	4	40	30	-40	28 EW	3 S=	-140	-2	90	-30	70
Net Imps -1

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 3

vs 108 ELLA & GEORGE LUPUL

NS 50		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	2NTS-1	-50	-1	-20	-90	-90	8 NS	3 S+3	170	1	130	300	290
2 NS	4 N+2	680	6	420	950	1060	9 NS	3 xN-3	-500	-7	-200	-170	-320
3 NS	3NTW+2	-660	-4	-530	-660	-670	10 NS	5 E=	-650	-12	80	-140	-120
4 NS	2NTW+1	-150	-3	-60	-470	-430	11 NS	3NTW+1	-430	-1	-390	-350	-270
5 NS	4 N-2	-200	-1	-160	-70	-140	12 NS	4 N=	620	4	460	190	250
6 NS	4 W-2	200	7	-90	-140	20	13 NS	5 W-4	400	6	160	10	40
7 NS	3 E+1	-130	-2	-80	-140	-100	14 NS	4 W=	-420	-7	-140	-90	-140
Net Imps -14

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 4

vs 107 CEDA NIKOLIC & BENJAMIN WYK

EW 54		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 EW	3NTW+1	430	-1	-450	-410	-450	22 EW	3 N+2	-200	-2	150	120	210
16 EW	3 S-2	100	2	-50	70	-10	23 EW	2 E=	110	-1	-130	-110	-140
17 EW	4 N=	-420	-5	250	400	420	24 EW	2 N-2	100	1	-70	-80	-60
18 EW	4 S+1	-650	-6	390	520	640	25 EW	4 N-1	50	3	40	120	-30
19 EW	3 E-1	-100	-5	-70	-80	50	26 EW	3 E=	140	-3	-250	-230	-270
20 EW	4 E-3	-300	-4	160	30	140	27 EW	4 S-1	50	9	350	410	360
21 EW	3 W-3	-150	-5	-30	-10	-130	28 EW	1NTS-2	200	6	20	-70	-20
Net Imps -11

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 5

vs 95 LITA SINGH & MOIRA SMITH

NS 53		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	4 E=	-420	-5	-240	-450	-380	8 NS	4 E-2	100	2	40	80	90
2 NS	1NTN-1	-100	-5	100	-20	20	9 NS	3NTN-2	-100	-2	-50	50	100
3 NS	4 S+1	150	0	140	290	130	10 NS	1NTS=	90	3	-10	60	-20
4 NS	3NTN=	600	12	-60	360	0	11 NS	2NTS+1	150	0	150	120	130
5 NS	4 S+3	710	0	700	710	800	12 NS	3 N-1	-100	-3	10	-90	-130
6 NS	4NTN=	430	-1	450	460	390	13 NS	3 E+1	-170	-3	-80	-100	-110
7 NS	4 W+3	-710	0	-700	-1550	-1070	14 NS	3NTS+1	430	-1	470	450	450
Net Imps -3

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 6

vs 106 NORMAN BULLEN & BRIAN LYNCH

NS 55		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	3 S+4	190	-8	530	320	350	22 NS	3NTW+1	-630	0	-640	-650	-560
16 NS	3 E+2	-150	1	-190	-440	-550	23 NS	6 S-1	-100	-11	490	470	450
17 NS	6 N-3	-150	-3	-30	-60	-80	24 NS	2 E+1	-140	-5	30	-20	-50
18 NS	5 S=	600	8	270	280	230	25 NS	5 E-1	100	5	-80	-230	-440
19 NS	4 W-2	200	2	120	-50	220	26 NS	5 E-1	100	-4	250	40	170
20 NS	2 E+1	-110	1	-140	-150	-140	27 NS	4 E=	-420	1	-450	-470	-450
21 NS	5 W=	-450	0	-460	-450	-450	28 NS	4 W-5	250	3	130	60	110
Net Imps -10

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 7

vs 114 SALLY CHAPMAN & BRIDGET LEWIS

EW 56		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
1 EW	3 E=	140	3	-20	-120	-110	8 EW	4 E-1	-50	5	220	230	210
2 EW	5 xE-3	-500	-3	390	390	150	9 EW	3 E+1	130	1	-100	-330	-100
3 EW	3NTW-2	-200	-12	-450	-650	-500	10 EW	4 E+1	650	0	-650	-450	-370
4 EW	4 N+1	-650	0	660	760	560	11 EW	3 S=	-140	-2	80	130	60
5 EW	3 E=	140	2	-70	-80	-130	12 EW	3NTN+2	-660	-1	640	800	720
6 EW	5 E+1	680	-4	-830	-800	-1010	13 EW	3NTN=	-600	-7	330	510	520
7 EW	2 E+2	170	2	-100	-110	-230	14 EW	3NTE+3	490	3	-370	-710	-610
Net Imps -13

______________________________________________________________________

112 PIP BURNETT & GRACIE STEELE SCOTT

Round 8

vs 110 MAURIE HUGHES & JANET RUSHWORTH

NS 56		2014 ANOT RESTRICTED PAIRS
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	RESTRICTED AVG	OPEN AVG	SENIORS AVG
15 NS	2 W-1	50	2	-30	-130	-70	22 NS	3NTS-1	-50	-3	50	180	150
16 NS	4 S=	130	2	50	-20	130	23 NS	2 W-1	100	-1	130	130	120
17 NS	5 W=	-400	-8	-70	-170	-250	24 NS	2 S+2	170	1	140	100	90
18 NS	3 W+1	-130	4	-270	-420	-360	25 NS	2 E+3	-200	8	-560	-410	-540
19 NS	2 W=	-110	-1	-70	-80	20	26 NS	1 E=	-80	-5	90	330	230
20 NS	2 E+1	-140	-3	-50	-570	-220	27 NS	4 W=	-420	1	-460	-470	-480
21 NS	2 S+1	140	5	-30	-110	50	28 NS	4 W+2	-480	3	-580	-480	-610
Net Imps 5

______________________________________________________________________