63 ROBERT MARTIN & CEDA NIKOLIC

Round 1

vs 53 RICHARD KRANTZ & MIKE ROBERTSON

EW 30		ANOT GRADED PAIRS - C GRADE
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG
1 EW	3NTN+1	-430	-2	370	290	400	5 EW	3NTE=	400	7	-120	-120	-80
2 EW	3NTS-1	100	3	20	-110	-70	6 EW	5 xN-3	500	9	-110	-40	-90
3 EW	4 E=	620	8	-260	-620	-560	7 EW	3NTE+1	630	7	-340	30	-230
4 EW	2 W=	110	3	-10	-100	-110	8 EW	3NTS=	-400	-9	20	30	10
Net Imps 26

______________________________________________________________________

63 ROBERT MARTIN & CEDA NIKOLIC

Round 2

vs 64 PENNY BOWEN & LIZ ROBERTSON

EW 24		ANOT GRADED PAIRS - C GRADE
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG
9 EW	4 S=	-420	-6	180	450	330	13 EW	2 S=	-110	-4	-50	110	-140
10 EW	5 N-1	100	1	-70	-280	-10	14 EW	6 S-2	100	9	300	420	380
11 EW	2 E+2	130	1	-90	-60	-50	15 EW	2 S+2	-130	0	140	150	110
12 EW	3 W+1	130	2	-70	-150	-130	16 EW	2NTS=	-120	-4	-40	-50	-60
Net Imps -1

______________________________________________________________________

63 ROBERT MARTIN & CEDA NIKOLIC

Round 3

vs 55 PETER TEUBNER & NEIL WELCH

EW 26		ANOT GRADED PAIRS - C GRADE
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG
17 EW	4 N+1	-450	-3	330	350	290	21 EW	3NTS=	-600	-9	230	40	100
18 EW	1NTS+1	-120	-1	90	110	80	22 EW	6NTE+1	1470	0	-1470	-1800	-1760
19 EW	3NTS-1	50	4	100	130	60	23 EW	4 N-1	100	4	40	-50	-180
20 EW	3 W=	110	2	-30	20	60	24 EW	3NTE-1	-50	-1	20	-250	-30
Net Imps -4

______________________________________________________________________

63 ROBERT MARTIN & CEDA NIKOLIC

Round 4

vs 52 PETER JANES & IAN RAMSEY

NS 27		ANOT GRADED PAIRS - C GRADE
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG
1 NS	2 W+1	-140	-2	-80	-80	-40	5 NS	3 S+1	170	-6	390	650	580
2 NS	2 S-1	-100	-1	-70	-100	-110	6 NS	2NTE-2	200	3	80	-40	30
3 NS	4 N=	420	-1	440	450	450	7 NS	4 E-4	400	4	240	200	50
4 NS	3 W=	-140	-2	-80	-80	-140	8 NS	1NTW=	-90	-1	-50	-110	-60
Net Imps -6

______________________________________________________________________

63 ROBERT MARTIN & CEDA NIKOLIC

Round 5

vs 62 ANTONINA & PETER HAYLES

EW 27		ANOT GRADED PAIRS - C GRADE
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG
9 EW	4 S-1	50	4	80	-60	220	13 EW	6 N=	-1430	-13	660	1050	930
10 EW	4 W-2	-200	-3	110	130	230	14 EW	2 S=	-110	-2	30	120	40
11 EW	1NTN+1	-120	-4	-40	-20	50	15 EW	1 E-1	-50	-3	-50	-40	-120
12 EW	4 N=	-130	6	370	470	140	16 EW	2 S+1	-110	-4	-30	-50	-20
Net Imps -19

______________________________________________________________________

63 ROBERT MARTIN & CEDA NIKOLIC

Round 6

vs 49 ANDY DUNCAN & HELEN KITE

NS 29		ANOT GRADED PAIRS - C GRADE
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG	ANOT AVG
17 NS	1 N+2	140	0	140	110	60	21 NS	4 W=	-420	-2	-360	-270	-420
18 NS	4 W-1	50	7	-260	-190	-310	22 NS	2NTW=	-120	-5	60	-100	-20
19 NS	4 E=	-620	0	-620	-610	-540	23 NS	3 W=	-110	-1	-70	-170	-180
20 NS	4 N=	620	8	270	-20	190	24 NS	3 N-1	-50	0	-40	0	50
Net Imps 7

______________________________________________________________________