ROUND THREE

AUTUMN NATIONALS

Board by Board Summary

FREQUENCY CHART FOR BOARDS 25 TO 38


Round 3

BdScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNo
25 -110 1   -100 4   -50 16   80 2   100 1   110 5   120 13   130 8   150 8   200 3   300 2   400 11                
26 -690 1   -660 12   -650 39   -630 1   -620 14   -210 1   100 6                               
27 -300 2   -150 2   -120 1   -100 4   -90 2   -50 16   50 4   80 1   90 2   100 1   110 15   120 5   140 13   150 2   200 1   400 1   470 2
28 -300 1   -170 1   -140 1   -100 8   -90 2   50 1   100 14   120 1   140 8   150 11   170 5   200 9   210 1   500 1   620 8   630 1   870 1
29 -1460 1   -1440 6   -1430 20   -690 2   -680 31   -660 1   -650 1   -630 6   100 2   200 4                      
30 -50 1   100 1   200 1   420 2   450 69                                     
31 -200 18   -140 2   -100 14   50 1   100 4   140 5   150 3   170 2   250 1   300 1   500 2   620 9   790 12             
32 -950 1   -690 1   -660 2   -650 1   -630 1   -620 5   -600 16   -300 1   -210 1   -180 1   -170 9   -150 16   -140 2   -130 4   -100 5   -50 1   100 7
33 -140 1   -110 5   -90 1   -50 4   50 4   90 10   100 5   110 28   120 13   140 2   150 1                   
34 -420 5   -200 5   -170 11   -140 18   -130 2   -110 4   -100 8   50 17   100 4                         
35 -1430 1   -1370 7   -800 4   -680 5   -650 20   -630 1   -620 10   -600 13   -500 5   -300 1   -150 2   100 5                
36 -800 2   -790 1   -680 2   -650 4   -620 53   -500 1   -200 2   -170 3   200 2   600 1   750 2   910 1                
37 -9999 2                                                 
38 -9999 2                                                 


1 THOMSON v 33 ZELLER

N-S Nye Griffiths & Liam MilneE-W Moss Wylie & Elizabeth Zeller
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 4 400 2 N+1 K -110 290 7 60 8
263NTW+2 4-660 4 W+1 10 650 -10 0 -650 0
271NTN= 7 90 1 S+1 Q -110 -20 -1 80 0
282 W-2 K 100 3 S+1 2 -170 -70 -2 170 -2
296 W= 6-1430 6NTW-2 3 -200 -1630 -17 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-2 2-200 4 S-1 A 100 -100 -3 110 -7
325 E= 10-600 3 W+2 8 150 -450 -10 -410 -5
332 S= K 110 3 N-1 2 50 160 4 70 1
344 W-1 5 50 3 E+1 K 130 180 5 -70 3
355 xS-3 A-500 6 W-1 J -100 -600 -12 -620 3
364 E= A-620 5 xN-1 Q 200 -420 -9 -590 -1
Totals -38  -10
NS Ranking 40thEW Ranking 35th

______________________________________________________________________

2 KANETKAR v 52 SUNDERASAN

N-S Avinash Kanetkar & Bruce NeillE-W Christy Geromboux & Francesca McGrath
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 4 400 1NTN+1 2 -120 280 7 60 8
264 E-1 9 100 4 W+1 5 650 750 13 -650 13
271 S+2 Q 140 4 S-3 Q 150 290 7 80 2
283 S= Q 140 2 W-2 A -100 40 1 170 -1
296NTW= 6-1440 6 W= 2 1430 -10 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= K 790 4 S-1 A 100 890 13 110 12
322 S-2 J-100 3 W+3 8 170 70 2 -410 7
331NTN+1 4 120 2 N= 2 -110 10 0 70 2
343 S-1 2-100 2 W+3 3 200 100 3 -70 -1
355 W= A-600 5 xN-4 7 800 200 5 -620 1
364 E= A-620 4 W= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  51   32
NS Ranking 12th
 

______________________________________________________________________

3 DOECKE v 35 FALLON

N-S Mike Doecke & Will Jenner-O'SheaE-W Ann Pettigrew & Adrienne Stephens
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 5-50 1 E+1 6 110 60 2 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 E+1 7 650 0 0 -650 0
272 N= K 110 1NTE-2 K -100 10 0 80 1
281NTE-4 3 200 2 E= 2 90 290 7 170 1
296 E= 2-1430 4 W+2 6 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 S+1 J 450 3 N+2 3 -200 250 6 450 0
314 xS= A 790 5 W-2 A -100 690 12 110 12
323NTW+3 3-690 3NTE= A 600 -90 -3 -410 -7
332 E-2 2 100 2 E+1 A 140 240 6 70 1
343 W= 5-140 4 W= 3 420 280 7 -70 -2
355 W= J-650 5 W+1 J 620 -30 -1 -620 -1
364 xE= 3-790 5 xN-3 4 800 10 0 -590 -5
Totals  23  -13
NS Ranking 84thEW Ranking 46th

______________________________________________________________________

4 MARKEY v 12 GILL

N-S Ron Klinger & Matthew MullamphyE-W Sophie Ashton & Peter Gill
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 4 120 3NTN= 4 -400 -280 -7 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
272 S= Q 110 1NTN+2 4 -150 -40 -1 80 1
282 W-2 K 100 3 S= 4 -140 -40 -1 170 -2
294NTW= 2-630 6 E= 6 1430 800 13 -980 8
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
315 xE-3 A 500 4 S-1 K 100 600 12 110 9
325 E= A-600 3NTE= 7 600 0 0 -410 -5
332 N= J 110 3 N= 6 -140 -30 -1 70 1
344 W-1 4 50 4 W= Q 420 470 10 -70 3
356 E-1 3 100 5 W= J 600 700 12 -620 12
364 E= A-620 5 xS-2 K 500 -120 -3 -590 -1
Totals  33   28
NS Ranking =19thEW Ranking 68th

______________________________________________________________________

5 LILLEY v 23 MILL

N-S David Lilley & Zolly NagyE-W Marina Darling & Justin Mill
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 6-50 3NTN-2 2 100 50 2 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 E+1 2 650 0 0 -650 0
273NTN= A 400 4 N-1 2 50 450 10 80 8
282 N-3 8-300 2 E-2 2 -100 -400 -9 170 -10
296 W= 2-1430 5 E+1 2 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 2 -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= A 620 4 N-1 2 100 720 12 110 11
322 W+1 6-140 4 E= 2 620 480 10 -410 7
331NTN= 2 90 2 E= 2 110 200 5 70 1
343NTE-2 A 100 3 E= 2 140 240 6 -70 5
355 xN-4 7-800 5 xN-3 2 500 -300 -7 -620 -5
364 E= 3-620 4 E= 2 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  16   3
NS Ranking 7thEW Ranking =42nd

______________________________________________________________________

6 BUCHEN v 10 KOZAKOS

N-S Andrew Braithwaite & Arjuna De LiveraE-W Brad Coles & Fraser Rew
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
254 N-2 5-100 2NTN= 4 -120 -220 -6 60 -4
263NTE+3 9-690 4 W= 10 620 -70 -2 -650 -1
272 S= Q 110 3NTS-3 Q 150 260 6 80 1
282 xS+1 Q 870 3NTN+1 K -630 240 6 170 12
294 E+2 4-680 4 W+2 6 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= K 620 5 W-5 A -250 370 9 110 11
323NTW= 4-600 1NTE+3 10 180 -420 -9 -410 -5
332 E-2 5 100 1NTN+1 4 -120 -20 -1 70 1
343NTE-2 A 100 4 E-1 A -50 50 2 -70 5
354 W+2 J-680 5 W= J 600 -80 -2 -620 -2
364 E= 8-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  3   24
NS Ranking 4thEW Ranking 72nd

______________________________________________________________________

7 SMOLANKO v 19 WATTS

N-S Jonathan Free & George SmolankoE-W George Bilski & Martin Bloom
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 N+1 2 130 3NTN-1 5 50 180 5 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
271 S+2 Q 140 2 S= Q -110 30 1 80 2
284 S-1 Q-100 4 S= Q -620 -720 -12 170 -7
296 E= 3-1430 4NTE+2 4 690 -740 -12 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
315 xE-3 K 500 4 S= A -620 -120 -3 110 9
325 E+1 9-620 3NTW= 4 600 -20 -1 -410 -5
332 S= A 110 2 E= 10 110 220 6 70 1
343 W= 3-140 3 S-1 A 100 -40 -1 -70 -2
354 E+1 Q-650 5 W= 4 650 0 0 -620 -1
364 E= 3-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -17  -12
 EW Ranking =19th

______________________________________________________________________

8 BOOKALLIL v 14 VADAS

N-S Stephen Fischer & David MorganE-W Mathew Vadas & Michael Wilkinson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+1 5 120 1NTN+2 4 -150 -30 -1 60 2
263NTW+2 5-660 4 W+1 10 650 -10 0 -650 0
271NTN+1 6 120 3NTS-2 Q 100 220 6 80 1
282 W-3 K 150 1NTS+2 3 -150 0 0 170 -1
296 W= 2-1430 4 E+2 2 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 K-200 4 S-2 K 200 0 0 110 -7
323 W+3 3-170 3 E+2 10 150 -20 -1 -410 6
332 S= A 110 1NTN= 4 -90 20 1 70 1
344 W-1 4 50 3 S-1 9 100 150 4 -70 3
355 W= 10-600 5 W= 2 600 0 0 -620 1
364 E= 3-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -4  -5
NS Ranking 57thEW Ranking =64th

______________________________________________________________________

9 BOURKE v 40 HENBEST

N-S Margaret Bourke & Sue LuskE-W Maxim Henbest & Christophe Leach
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N= 4 80 3NTN= 2 -400 -320 -8 60 1
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
274 S-1 Q-50 2 S= 3 -110 -160 -4 80 -4
284 S= Q 620 2 W-2 5 -100 520 11 170 10
294NTW= 3-630 4 W+2 2 680 50 2 -980 8
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 3 -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 4 xS= A -790 -990 -14 110 -7
325 E-1 10 100 3 W+3 2 170 270 7 -410 11
332 N= J 110 2 S= 6 -110 0 0 70 1
343 W= 3-140 4 W= 9 420 280 7 -70 -2
353NTE= 3-600 4 W+2 J 680 80 2 -620 1
364 E= A-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  3   18
NS Ranking 37th
 

______________________________________________________________________

10 KOZAKOS v 6 BUCHEN

N-S George Kozakos & Michael SmartE-W Peter Buchen & Chris Hughes
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 4 120 4 N-2 5 100 220 6 60 2
264 W= 10-620 3NTE+3 9 690 70 2 -650 1
273NTS-3 Q-150 2 S= Q -110 -260 -6 80 -6
283NTN+1 K 630 2 xS+1 Q -870 -240 -6 170 10
294 W+2 6-680 4 E+2 4 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
315 W-5 A 250 4 S= K -620 -370 -9 110 4
321NTE+3 10-180 3NTW= 4 600 420 9 -410 6
331NTN+1 4 120 2 E-2 5 -100 20 1 70 2
344 E-1 A 50 3NTE-2 A -100 -50 -2 -70 3
355 W= J-600 4 W+2 J 680 80 2 -620 1
364 E= A-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -3   29
NS Ranking 5th
 

______________________________________________________________________

11 WILLIAMS v 26 NASH

N-S Shane Harrison & Justin WilliamsE-W Neville Francis & Murray Perrin
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-2 3-100 1 N+3 2 -130 -230 -6 60 -4
264 E= 9-620 3NTE+2 2 660 40 1 -650 1
273NTN-1 7-50 4 xN-1 2 100 50 2 80 -4
282 E-3 4 150 1NTE-4 2 -200 -50 -2 170 -1
296NTW-2 3 200 6 W= 2 1430 1630 17 -980 15
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 2 -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-2 K-200 4 xN-1 2 200 0 0 110 -7
325 E= 10-600 3NTE= 2 600 0 0 -410 -5
331NTN+1 4 120 1NTN+2 2 -150 -30 -1 70 2
343 W+1 3-170 3 N-1 2 100 -70 -2 -70 -3
354 W+1 J-650 5 E= 2 650 0 0 -620 -1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= 2 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  9  -8
NS Ranking 60thEW Ranking 77th

______________________________________________________________________

12 GILL v 4 MARKEY

N-S Helena Dawson & Sartaj HansE-W Philip Markey & Ben Thompson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 4 400 2NTN= 4 -120 280 7 60 8
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
271NTN+2 4 150 2 S= Q -110 40 1 80 2
283 S= 4 140 2 W-2 K -100 40 1 170 -1
296 E= 6-1430 4NTW= 2 630 -800 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 K-100 5 xE-3 A -500 -600 -12 110 -5
323NTE= 7-600 5 E= A 600 0 0 -410 -5
333 N= 6 140 2 N= J -110 30 1 70 2
344 W= Q-420 4 W-1 4 -50 -470 -10 -70 -8
355 W= J-600 6 E-1 3 -100 -700 -12 -620 1
365 xS-2 K-500 4 E= A 620 120 3 -590 3
Totals -33  -12
NS Ranking =19thEW Ranking =9th

______________________________________________________________________

13 HOLLANDS v 30 ASHTON

N-S Peter Hollands & Deana WilsonE-W Wendy Ashton & Tony Nunn
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+1 6 120 2 W-2 A -200 -80 -2 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
274 S-1 Q-50 1NTE= K 90 40 1 80 -4
282 W-3 A 150 3 N+1 3 -170 -20 -1 170 -1
294 W+2 5-680 6 E= A 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
315 W-3 A 150 4 S-1 K 100 250 6 110 1
325 E-1 10 100 1NTE+2 A 150 250 6 -410 11
332 N= 4 110 1NTN= A -90 20 1 70 1
344 W-1 2 50 3 E= A 110 160 4 -70 3
355 E= 8-650 5 xN-3 7 500 -150 -4 -620 -1
365 S-2 K-200 4 E= 8 620 420 9 -590 9
Totals  32   28
NS Ranking 49thEW Ranking 58th

______________________________________________________________________

14 VADAS v 8 BOOKALLIL

N-S Matt Smith & Jamie ThompsonE-W Marianne Bookallil & Jodi Tutty
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+2 4 150 1NTN+1 5 -120 30 1 60 3
264 W+1 10-650 3NTW+2 5 660 10 0 -650 0
273NTS-2 Q-100 1NTN+1 6 -120 -220 -6 80 -5
281NTS+2 3 150 2 W-3 K -150 0 0 170 -1
294 E+2 2-680 6 W= 2 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-2 K-200 4 xS-1 K 200 0 0 110 -7
323 E+2 10-150 3 W+3 3 170 20 1 -410 6
331NTN= 4 90 2 S= A -110 -20 -1 70 1
343 S-1 9-100 4 W-1 4 -50 -150 -4 -70 -1
355 W= 2-600 5 W= 10 600 0 0 -620 1
364 E= A-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  4   3
NS Ranking =51stEW Ranking =74th

______________________________________________________________________

15 HAFFER v 17 DE LUCA

N-S Leigh Gold & Joachim HafferE-W Attilio De Luca & David Lusk
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 N+1 4 130 2 S= A -110 20 1 60 2
264 E-1 9 100 4 E= 9 620 720 12 -650 13
274 xS-1 J-100 2 S+1 Q -140 -240 -6 80 -5
283 E-1 8 50 4 S= Q -620 -570 -11 170 -3
296 E= 3-1430 6 E= 7 1430 0 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 K-200 4 S= K -620 -820 -13 110 -7
323NTE-1 10 100 3 W+3 8 170 270 7 -410 11
332 E-1 2 50 2 E-2 10 -100 -50 -2 70 -1
344 W-1 4 50 4 W-1 3 -50 0 0 -70 3
354 E+1 7-650 5 W= J 600 -50 -2 -620 -1
365 xN= Q 750 4 E= 8 620 1370 16 -590 16
Totals  2   18
NS Ranking 6th
 

______________________________________________________________________

16 HARMS v 31 LUCK

N-S Peter Fordham & Alan WatsonE-W David Appleton & John Luck
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 3-50 2NTN= 4 -120 -170 -5 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
273NTN-1 3-50 2 S= J -110 -160 -4 80 -4
282 S+1 Q 140 4 S= 4 -620 -480 -10 170 -1
294 E+2 3-680 6 E= 6 1430 750 13 -980 7
306 N-1 A-50 4 N+1 K -450 -500 -11 450 -11
313 S= A 140 4 S-1 K 100 240 6 110 1
325 E= 10-600 2 W+1 A 140 -460 -10 -410 -5
331NTN+1 6 120 2 S= 6 -110 10 0 70 2
344 W-1 4 50 4 S-2 A 200 250 6 -70 3
355 xN-4 5-800 4 W+1 2 650 -150 -4 -620 -5
365 xE-1 3 200 4 E= A 620 820 13 -590 13
Totals -7  -3
NS Ranking =42ndEW Ranking 28th

______________________________________________________________________

17 DE LUCA v 15 HAFFER

N-S Paul Hudson & John ZolloE-W Neil Ewart & Jon Hunt
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252 S= A 110 3 N+1 4 -130 -20 -1 60 2
264 E= 9-620 4 E-1 9 -100 -720 -12 -650 1
272 S+1 Q 140 4 xS-1 J 100 240 6 80 2
284 S= Q 620 3 E-1 8 -50 570 11 170 10
296 E= 7-1430 6 E= 3 1430 0 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= K 620 4 xS-1 K 200 820 13 110 11
323 W+3 8-170 3NTE-1 10 -100 -270 -7 -410 6
332 E-2 10 100 2 E-1 2 -50 50 2 70 1
344 W-1 3 50 4 W-1 4 -50 0 0 -70 3
355 W= J-600 4 E+1 7 650 50 2 -620 1
364 E= 8-620 5 xN= Q -750 -1370 -16 -590 -1
Totals -2   26
NS Ranking =9th
 

______________________________________________________________________

18 TRAVIS v 29 CHERRY

N-S Vanessa Brown & Lauren TravisE-W Gordon Fallon & Rex Whitford
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 N+1 4 130 1 N= 2 -80 50 2 60 2
263NTW+1 5-630 4 W= 5 620 -10 0 -650 1
274 S-1 Q-50 2 S= 10 -110 -160 -4 80 -4
282 W-4 A 200 4 S= Q -620 -420 -9 170 1
296 E= 6-1430 4 E+2 6 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 2 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= A 790 4 S-1 K 100 890 13 110 12
324 E+2 10-170 6 E-1 A -100 -270 -7 -410 6
331NTN= 10 90 2 N= J -110 -20 -1 70 1
343 E+1 A-130 2 W+1 J 140 10 0 -70 -2
356 W= 4-1370 4 W+2 4 680 -690 -12 -620 -13
365 xE-1 8 200 5 xN= A -750 -550 -11 -590 13
Totals -42   7
NS Ranking 56thEW Ranking =79th

______________________________________________________________________

19 WATTS v 7 SMOLANKO

N-S Michael Prescott & Marlene WattsE-W Simon Hinge & Robbie Van Riel
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 5-50 3 N+1 2 -130 -180 -5 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
272 S= Q 110 1 S+2 Q -140 -30 -1 80 1
284 S= Q 620 4 S-1 Q 100 720 12 170 10
294NTE+2 4-690 6 E= 3 1430 740 12 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= A 620 5 xE-3 K -500 120 3 110 11
323NTW= 4-600 5 E+1 9 620 20 1 -410 -5
332 E= 10-110 2 S= A -110 -220 -6 70 -5
343 S-1 A-100 3 W= 3 140 40 1 -70 -1
355 W= 4-650 4 E+1 Q 650 0 0 -620 -1
364 E= 3-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  17   13
NS Ranking =29thEW Ranking 12th

______________________________________________________________________

20 KELSO v 48 BUGEIA

N-S Laura Ginnan & Sebastian YuenE-W Ken Colbert & Alexander Hewat
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252 N+1 4 110 1NTN+1 4 -120 -10 0 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
272NTS= Q 120 4 W-4 2 -200 -80 -2 80 1
281NTE-2 5 100 4 S-1 Q 100 200 5 170 -2
293NTE+1 Q-630 6NTW= 5 1440 810 13 -980 8
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
315 xW-2 A 300 1 S+2 K -140 160 4 110 5
322 S-2 J-100 3NTW+1 4 630 530 11 -410 7
332 N= 4 110 3 N-1 4 50 160 4 70 1
343 W= 3-140 3 E= A 110 -30 -1 -70 -2
355 W+1 J-620 6 E= 5 1370 750 13 -620 0
364 W= K-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  47   19
NS Ranking 27thEW Ranking =81st

______________________________________________________________________

21 WOOD v 25 ADAMS

N-S Kim Morrison & Viv WoodE-W Elizabeth Adams & Andrew Peake
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 2-50 1 N+3 4 -130 -180 -5 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
272 S+1 5 140 1NTN= 6 -90 50 2 80 2
281NTE-4 5 200 1NTS+2 2 -150 50 2 170 1
294 W+2 3-680 4 E+2 2 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 6 -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 K-200 5 E-2 A -100 -300 -7 110 -7
323 E+3 10-170 3 E+3 7 170 0 0 -410 6
331NTN= 4 90 2 S= 6 -110 -20 -1 70 1
342 W+2 3-170 4 S-2 K 200 30 1 -70 -3
356 W= 3-1370 5 xN-3 7 500 -870 -13 -620 -13
364 E= 8-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -21  -10
NS Ranking =64thEW Ranking 40th

______________________________________________________________________

22 CHAN v 51 BARRIE

N-S Peter Chan & Robert SebesfiE-W Mary Allison & Helen Stewart
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+2 5 150 3NTN-1 2 50 200 5 60 3
264 W+1 5-650 4 E-1 9 -100 -750 -13 -650 0
271 S+2 5 140 1NTE= K 90 230 6 80 2
283 S= 5 140 2 W-2 6 -100 40 1 170 -1
295NTW-1 5 100 5 E+1 A 680 780 13 -980 14
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= A 620 4 xS= K -790 -170 -5 110 11
325 E= 5-600 5 E+1 A 620 20 1 -410 -5
332 N= J 110 2 E-1 10 -50 60 2 70 1
344 W-1 5 50 4 W= 3 420 470 10 -70 3
355 xN-3 5-500 4 W+1 10 650 150 4 -620 3
364 E= 8-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  24   30
NS Ranking 12th
 

______________________________________________________________________

23 MILL v 5 LILLEY

N-S Annette Maluish & Andrew MillE-W Phil Gue & David Middleton
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-2 2-100 3NTN-1 6 50 -50 -2 60 -4
264 E+1 2-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
274 N-1 2-50 3NTN= A -400 -450 -10 80 -4
282 E-2 2 100 2 N-3 8 300 400 9 170 -2
295 E+1 2-680 6 W= 2 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 2 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 N-1 2-100 4 S= A -620 -720 -12 110 -5
324 E= 2-620 2 W+1 6 140 -480 -10 -410 -5
332 E= 2-110 1NTN= 2 -90 -200 -5 70 -5
343 E= 2-140 3NTE-2 A -100 -240 -6 -70 -2
355 xN-3 2-500 5 xN-4 7 800 300 7 -620 3
364 E= 2-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -16  -18
NS Ranking 46thEW Ranking 33rd

______________________________________________________________________

24 SMYTH v 28 HOCKING

N-S Sheila Bird & Karen CreetE-W David & Yadi Parrott
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 5-50 3NTN-1 4 50 0 0 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 W= A 620 -30 -1 -650 0
271NTE-1 K 50 2 S= Q -110 -60 -2 80 -1
281NTE-4 5 200 2 W-2 K -100 100 3 170 1
296 W= 6-1430 4 E+2 4 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 4 S-1 A 100 -100 -3 110 -7
324 W+1 3-650 4 E= 2 620 -30 -1 -410 -6
331NTN= 6 90 1NTW-1 2 -50 40 1 70 1
344 xW-1 3 100 3 S-1 2 100 200 5 -70 5
355 W+1 6-680 5 W+1 4 620 -60 -2 -620 -2
364 E= 3-620 4 W= 10 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -13  -23
NS Ranking 93rdEW Ranking 2nd

______________________________________________________________________

25 ADAMS v 21 WOOD

N-S Jane Dawson & Murray GreenE-W Keiran Crowe-Mai & David Weston
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N+3 4 130 3NTN-1 2 50 180 5 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
271NTN= 6 90 2 S+1 5 -140 -50 -2 80 0
281NTS+2 2 150 1NTE-4 5 -200 -50 -2 170 -1
294 E+2 2-680 4 W+2 3 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 6 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
315 E-2 A 100 4 xS-1 K 200 300 7 110 0
323 E+3 7-170 3 E+3 10 170 0 0 -410 6
332 S= 6 110 1NTN= 4 -90 20 1 70 1
344 S-2 K-200 2 W+2 3 170 -30 -1 -70 -4
355 xN-3 7-500 6 W= 3 1370 870 13 -620 3
364 E= A-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  21   13
NS Ranking =31stEW Ranking 97th

______________________________________________________________________

26 NASH v 11 WILLIAMS

N-S Bill Nash & James WallisE-W Nick Jacob & Stephen Williams
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N+3 2 130 3NTN-2 3 100 230 6 60 2
263NTE+2 2-660 4 E= 9 620 -40 -1 -650 0
274 xN-1 2-100 3NTN-1 7 50 -50 -2 80 -5
281NTE-4 2 200 2 E-3 4 -150 50 2 170 1
296 W= 2-1430 6NTW-2 3 -200 -1630 -17 -980 -10
304 N+1 2 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xN-1 2-200 4 S-2 K 200 0 0 110 -7
323NTE= 2-600 5 E= 10 600 0 0 -410 -5
331NTN+2 2 150 1NTN+1 4 -120 30 1 70 2
343 N-1 2-100 3 W+1 3 170 70 2 -70 -1
355 E= 2-650 4 W+1 J 650 0 0 -620 -1
364 E= 2-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -9  -25
NS Ranking 97thEW Ranking =31st

______________________________________________________________________

27 HUMPHRIES v 32 CURTIS

N-S Jessica Brake & Susan HumphriesE-W Garry & Sally Clarke
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 4 120 3NTN= 4 -400 -280 -7 60 2
264 W+1 5-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
273NTN-1 A-50 2 xS= 3 -470 -520 -11 80 -4
284 xW-3 4 500 2 E= 2 90 590 11 170 8
294 E+2 4-680 3NTW+3 3 690 10 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 3 -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= K 790 4 xS-1 A 200 990 14 110 12
325 E+1 10-620 3NTxW+1 3 950 330 8 -410 -5
332 S= A 110 1NTN+1 4 -120 -10 0 70 1
344 E-1 J 50 4 W-1 4 -50 0 0 -70 3
356 W= 4-1370 4 W= 2 620 -750 -13 -620 -13
364 W= K-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  2   10
NS Ranking =16thEW Ranking 87th

______________________________________________________________________

28 HOCKING v 24 SMYTH

N-S Judy Hocking & Kevin LangeE-W Felicity Smyth & Judith Tobin
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 4-50 3NTN-1 5 50 0 0 60 -3
264 W= A-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
272 S= Q 110 1NTE-1 K -50 60 2 80 1
282 W-2 K 100 1NTE-4 5 -200 -100 -3 170 -2
294 E+2 4-680 6 W= 6 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 4 xS-1 A 200 100 3 110 -5
324 E= 2-620 4 W+1 3 650 30 1 -410 -5
331NTW-1 2 50 1NTN= 6 -90 -40 -1 70 -1
343 S-1 2-100 4 xW-1 3 -100 -200 -5 -70 -1
355 W+1 4-620 5 W+1 6 680 60 2 -620 0
364 W= 10-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  13  -9
 EW Ranking =25th

______________________________________________________________________

29 CHERRY v 18 TRAVIS

N-S David Cherry & John HorowitzE-W Candice Ginsberg & Barbara Travis
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N= 2 80 3 N+1 4 -130 -50 -2 60 1
264 W= 5-620 3NTW+1 5 630 10 0 -650 1
272 S= 10 110 4 S-1 Q 50 160 4 80 1
284 S= Q 620 2 W-4 A -200 420 9 170 10
294 E+2 6-680 6 E= 6 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 2 -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 K-100 4 xS= A -790 -890 -13 110 -5
326 E-1 A 100 4 E+2 10 170 270 7 -410 11
332 N= J 110 1NTN= 10 -90 20 1 70 1
342 W+1 J-140 3 E+1 A 130 -10 0 -70 -2
354 W+2 4-680 6 W= 4 1370 690 12 -620 -2
365 xN= A 750 5 xE-1 8 -200 550 11 -590 16
Totals  42   39
NS Ranking =29th
 

______________________________________________________________________

30 ASHTON v 13 HOLLANDS

N-S Wallace Ashton & Howard MelbourneE-W Chris Mulley & Tim Munro
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252 W-2 A 200 1NTN+1 6 -120 80 2 60 4
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
271NTE= K-90 4 S-1 Q 50 -40 -1 80 -5
283 N+1 3 170 2 W-3 A -150 20 1 170 0
296 E= A-1430 4 W+2 5 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 K-100 5 W-3 A -150 -250 -6 110 -5
321NTE+2 A-150 5 E-1 10 -100 -250 -6 -410 6
331NTN= A 90 2 N= 4 -110 -20 -1 70 1
343 E= A-110 4 W-1 2 -50 -160 -4 -70 -1
355 xN-3 7-500 5 E= 8 650 150 4 -620 3
364 E= 8-620 5 S-2 K 200 -420 -9 -590 -1
Totals -32  -7
NS Ranking =23rdEW Ranking 3rd

______________________________________________________________________

31 LUCK v 16 HARMS

N-S Ivy Luck & Ralph ParkerE-W Russel Harms & Jeff Travis
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 4 120 3NTN-1 3 50 170 5 60 2
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
272 S= J 110 3NTN-1 3 50 160 4 80 1
284 S= 4 620 2 S+1 Q -140 480 10 170 10
296 E= 6-1430 4 E+2 3 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 K 450 6 N-1 A 50 500 11 450 0
314 S-1 K-100 3 S= A -140 -240 -6 110 -5
322 W+1 A-140 5 E= 10 600 460 10 -410 7
332 S= 6 110 1NTN+1 6 -120 -10 0 70 1
344 S-2 A-200 4 W-1 4 -50 -250 -6 -70 -4
354 W+1 2-650 5 xN-4 5 800 150 4 -620 -1
364 E= A-620 5 xE-1 3 -200 -820 -13 -590 -1
Totals  7   1
NS Ranking 34thEW Ranking 54th

______________________________________________________________________

32 CURTIS v 27 HUMPHRIES

N-S Anita Curtis & David HudsonE-W Ann & Colin Baker
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 4 400 2NTN= 4 -120 280 7 60 8
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 5 650 0 0 -650 0
272 xS= 3 470 3NTN-1 A 50 520 11 80 9
282 E= 2-90 4 xW-3 4 -500 -590 -11 170 -6
293NTW+3 3-690 4 E+2 4 680 -10 0 -980 7
304 N+1 3 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 4 xS= K -790 -990 -14 110 -7
323NTxW+1 3-950 5 E+1 10 620 -330 -8 -410 -11
331NTN+1 4 120 2 S= A -110 10 0 70 2
344 W-1 4 50 4 E-1 J -50 0 0 -70 3
354 W= 2-620 6 W= 4 1370 750 13 -620 0
364 E= 3-620 4 W= K 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -2   4
NS Ranking 87th
 

______________________________________________________________________

33 ZELLER v 1 THOMSON

N-S Lisa Csima & Kate DaviesE-W David Beauchamp & Matthew Thomson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252 N+1 K 110 3NTN= 4 -400 -290 -7 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 3NTW+2 4 660 10 0 -650 0
271 S+1 Q 110 1NTN= 7 -90 20 1 80 1
283 S+1 2 170 2 W-2 K -100 70 2 170 0
296NTW-2 3 200 6 W= 6 1430 1630 17 -980 15
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 4 S-2 2 200 100 3 110 -5
323 W+2 8-150 5 E= 10 600 450 10 -410 6
333 N-1 2-50 2 S= K -110 -160 -4 70 -3
343 E+1 K-130 4 W-1 5 -50 -180 -5 -70 -2
356 W-1 J 100 5 xS-3 A 500 600 12 -620 12
365 xN-1 Q-200 4 E= A 620 420 9 -590 9
Totals  38   35
NS Ranking 1stEW Ranking 54th

______________________________________________________________________

34 KEFFORD v 57 TRUSCOTT

N-S Margaret & Michael KeffordE-W Maggie & Nick Truscott
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+1 4 120 3NTN= 2 -400 -280 -7 60 2
263NTW+2 10-660 4 W+1 2 650 -10 0 -650 0
271NTS+1 Q 120 1 S+1 Q -110 10 0 80 1
281NTS+2 3 150 2 S+1 Q -140 10 0 170 -1
294NTW+1 3-660 4 E+2 2 680 20 1 -980 8
304 N+1 3 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
315 W-2 A 100 4 W-3 2 -150 -50 -2 110 0
323NTW+2 3-660 2 xS-2 J 300 -360 -8 -410 -6
332 S= K 110 2 E= 5 110 220 6 70 1
344 W-1 3 50 3 W= 4 140 190 5 -70 3
354 E= 3-620 4 W+1 4 650 30 1 -620 0
364 E= A-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -4   7
NS Ranking 54thEW Ranking 93rd

______________________________________________________________________

35 FALLON v 3 DOECKE

N-S Alison Fallon & Barbara MarrettE-W Matthew McManus & Johnno Newman
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 E+1 6-110 3NTN-1 5 50 -60 -2 60 -5
264 E+1 7-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
271NTE-2 K 100 2 N= K -110 -10 0 80 1
282 E= 2-90 1NTE-4 3 -200 -290 -7 170 -6
294 W+2 6-680 6 E= 2 1430 750 13 -980 7
303 N+2 3 200 4 S+1 J -450 -250 -6 450 -6
315 W-2 A 100 4 xS= A -790 -690 -12 110 0
323NTE= A-600 3NTW+3 3 690 90 3 -410 -5
332 E+1 A-140 2 E-2 2 -100 -240 -6 70 -5
344 W= 3-420 3 W= 5 140 -280 -7 -70 -8
355 W+1 J-620 5 W= J 650 30 1 -620 0
365 xN-3 4-800 4 xE= 3 790 -10 0 -590 -5
Totals -23  -32
 EW Ranking =16th

______________________________________________________________________

36 MOTTRAM v 37 ALEXANDER

N-S Henrietta Hohnen & John MottramE-W Linda Alexander & Wendy Hooper
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 4-50 2NTN+1 4 -150 -200 -5 60 -3
263NTW+2 5-660 4 W= 10 620 -40 -1 -650 0
274 xS-2 J-300 1NTE-1 A -50 -350 -8 80 -9
283 S+1 4 170 1NTE-3 5 -150 20 1 170 0
296NTW-1 3 100 5 W+1 6 680 780 13 -980 14
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 5 -450 0 0 450 0
315 W-3 6 150 4 xS-1 A 200 350 8 110 1
323NTW+2 4-660 3 E+3 7 170 -490 -10 -410 -6
331NTW= 2-90 2 E= 10 110 20 1 70 -4
343 W= 3-140 3 W+1 3 170 30 1 -70 -2
356 W= 4-1370 6 W= A 1370 0 0 -620 -13
364 E+1 8-650 5 N= A -600 -1250 -15 -590 -2
Totals -15  -24
NS Ranking 87thEW Ranking =19th

______________________________________________________________________

37 ALEXANDER v 36 MOTTRAM

N-S Jill Allanson & Angela NorrisE-W Axel Johannsson & Liz Sylvester
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN+1 4 150 3NTN-1 4 50 200 5 60 3
264 W= 10-620 3NTW+2 5 660 40 1 -650 1
271NTE-1 A 50 4 xS-2 J 300 350 8 80 -1
281NTE-3 5 150 3 S+1 4 -170 -20 -1 170 -1
295 W+1 6-680 6NTW-1 3 -100 -780 -13 -980 7
304 N+1 5 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 5 W-3 6 -150 -350 -8 110 -7
323 E+3 7-170 3NTW+2 4 660 490 10 -410 6
332 E= 10-110 1NTW= 2 90 -20 -1 70 -5
343 W+1 3-170 3 W= 3 140 -30 -1 -70 -3
356 W= A-1370 6 W= 4 1370 0 0 -620 -13
365 N= A 600 4 E+1 8 650 1250 15 -590 15
Totals  15   2
NS Ranking 72ndEW Ranking =74th

______________________________________________________________________

38 BOLT v 43 MORGAN KING

N-S Bijan Assaee & Dominic KwokE-W Susan Emerson & Rosemary Grund
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN+1 4 150 3NTN-1 4 50 200 5 60 3
264 W+1 5-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
274 S-1 Q-50 4 S-1 Q 50 0 0 80 -4
282 W-4 A 200 1NTS+1 Q -120 80 2 170 1
294 E+2 A-680 6NTW= 2 1440 760 13 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= K 620 4 S-1 K 100 720 12 110 11
322 N-1 8-50 5 W= 6 600 550 11 -410 8
332 S= 5 110 2 S= 4 -110 0 0 70 1
343 W= 5-140 4 W-1 3 -50 -190 -5 -70 -2
355 W= 5-650 5 W= A 650 0 0 -620 -1
364 E= 5-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  37   23
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

39 FISHER v 61 SHILLING

N-S Blair & Liz FisherE-W Arthur Davies & David Shilling
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252 S= A 110 2NTN+1 2 -150 -40 -1 60 2
262NTE+3 5-210 4 W+1 10 650 440 10 -650 10
272 S+1 Q 140 4 xS-2 Q 300 440 10 80 2
284 S= Q 620 3 S-1 Q 100 720 12 170 10
294 E+2 K-680 4 W+2 6 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 5 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= A 790 4 S= K -620 170 5 110 12
322NTW+3 3-210 3 E+2 5 150 -60 -2 -410 5
332 E-2 2 100 1NTS+1 6 -120 -20 -1 70 1
343 W+2 4-200 3 S-1 A 100 -100 -3 -70 -4
354 E= 7-620 6 W= 6 1430 810 13 -620 0
364 W+1 K-650 4 E= 10 620 -30 -1 -590 -2
Totals  42   43
NS Ranking 22nd
 

______________________________________________________________________

40 HENBEST v 9 BOURKE

N-S Sylvia Gluck & Ben KinghamE-W Richard Brightling & David Hoffman
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 2 400 1 N= 4 -80 320 8 60 8
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
272 S= 3 110 4 S-1 Q 50 160 4 80 1
282 W-2 5 100 4 S= Q -620 -520 -11 170 -2
294 W+2 2-680 4NTW= 3 630 -50 -2 -980 7
304 N+1 3 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= A 790 4 xS-1 A 200 990 14 110 12
323 W+3 2-170 5 E-1 10 -100 -270 -7 -410 6
332 S= 6 110 2 N= J -110 0 0 70 1
344 W= 9-420 3 W= 3 140 -280 -7 -70 -8
354 W+2 J-680 3NTE= 3 600 -80 -2 -620 -2
364 E= A-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -3   22
NS Ranking 14th
 

______________________________________________________________________

41 BUDAI v 54 STURGUL

N-S Ferenc Budai & Yumin LiE-W John & Terry Pearson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 E-3 6 300 5 N-1 4 50 350 8 60 6
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 8 650 0 0 -650 0
273NTN-1 A-50 2 S= Q -110 -160 -4 80 -4
281NTE-2 5 100 2 S+2 6 -170 -70 -2 170 -2
294 E+2 Q-680 6 W= 6 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
313 S= K 140 4 xS-1 K 200 340 8 110 1
324 E+1 6-150 3NTW-1 4 -100 -250 -6 -410 6
331NTN= 4 90 1NTS= A -90 0 0 70 1
344 W-1 J 50 3 W+1 3 170 220 6 -70 3
356 E-1 10 100 4 W+1 10 650 750 13 -620 12
364 E= A-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  36   29
NS Ranking 46th
 

______________________________________________________________________

42 HARRIS v 49 GUNNER

N-S Bob Clarke & Arthur PorterE-W Kayoko Miki & Prudie Wagner
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 4 400 1 N+4 2 -150 250 6 60 8
264 W+1 10-650 3NTW+2 2 660 10 0 -650 0
271 S+2 Q 140 2 S+1 3 -140 0 0 80 2
281NTE-4 5 200 2 W-2 A -100 100 3 170 1
293NTE+1 4-630 6 E+1 7 1460 830 13 -980 8
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
313 W= A-140 4 W-1 6 -50 -190 -5 110 -6
324 E+1 6-150 3 E+3 5 170 20 1 -410 6
332 N= 2 110 2 N= 4 -110 0 0 70 1
343 W+2 3-200 3 W= J 140 -60 -2 -70 -4
356 W= 10-1370 4 W+1 2 650 -720 -12 -620 -13
364 E= A-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  4   2
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

43 MORGAN KING v 38 BOLT

N-S Therese Demarco & Pam Morgan-KingE-W Bastian Bolt & Nikolas Moore
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 4-50 2NTN+1 4 -150 -200 -5 60 -3
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 5 650 30 1 -650 1
274 S-1 Q-50 4 S-1 Q 50 0 0 80 -4
281NTS+1 Q 120 2 W-4 A -200 -80 -2 170 -2
296NTW= 2-1440 4 E+2 A 680 -760 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 K-100 4 S= K -620 -720 -12 110 -5
325 W= 6-600 2 N-1 8 50 -550 -11 -410 -5
332 S= 4 110 2 S= 5 -110 0 0 70 1
344 W-1 3 50 3 W= 5 140 190 5 -70 3
355 W= A-650 5 W= 5 650 0 0 -620 -1
364 E= 3-620 4 E= 5 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -37  -26
 EW Ranking =23rd

______________________________________________________________________

44 GLENN v 45 GRENSIDE

N-S Milton Hart & Sharmini HooleE-W Richard & Sue Grenside
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 2 400 2NTN= 3 -120 280 7 60 8
264 E= 9-620 4 W-1 A -100 -720 -12 -650 1
272 S= Q 110 1 S+2 Q -140 -30 -1 80 1
283 S-1 4-100 2 W-2 K -100 -200 -5 170 -7
296NTE= 4-1440 4 E+2 7 680 -760 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= K 790 5 S-2 K 200 990 14 110 12
322 xS-1 J-100 5 E= K 600 500 11 -410 7
333 E-2 10 100 1NTN+1 5 -120 -20 -1 70 1
343 W+1 3-170 4 W-1 J -50 -220 -6 -70 -3
355 W= 10-600 5 S-3 K 150 -450 -10 -620 1
364 E= 3-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -16   10
NS Ranking 60thEW Ranking 90th

______________________________________________________________________

45 GRENSIDE v 44 GLENN

N-S Dianne Marler & Margaret YuillE-W June Glenn & Alan Hamilton
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 3 120 3NTN= 2 -400 -280 -7 60 2
264 W-1 A 100 4 E= 9 620 720 12 -650 13
271 S+2 Q 140 2 S= Q -110 30 1 80 2
282 W-2 K 100 3 S-1 4 100 200 5 170 -2
294 E+2 7-680 6NTE= 4 1440 760 13 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
315 S-2 K-200 4 xS= K -790 -990 -14 110 -7
325 E= K-600 2 xS-1 J 100 -500 -11 -410 -5
331NTN+1 5 120 3 E-2 10 -100 20 1 70 2
344 W-1 J 50 3 W+1 3 170 220 6 -70 3
355 S-3 K-150 5 W= 10 600 450 10 -620 10
364 E= A-620 4 E= 3 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  16   24
NS Ranking 49th
 

______________________________________________________________________

46 FINIKIOTIS v 47 COLMER

N-S Liz Fanos & George FinikiotisE-W Susan Phillips & Jackie Ward
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N+3 4 130 4 N-1 4 50 180 5 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 2 E-1 5 -100 -750 -13 -650 0
274 S-1 J-50 1NTE-3 K -150 -200 -5 80 -4
281NTE-4 5 200 1NTE-3 4 -150 50 2 170 1
294 E+2 4-680 3NTE+1 4 630 -50 -2 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 4 xS-1 A 200 0 0 110 -7
325 E= 7-600 3 E+2 10 150 -450 -10 -410 -5
331NTN+1 6 120 1NTN= 4 -90 30 1 70 2
343 W= J-140 3 S-1 A 100 -40 -1 -70 -2
355 W= 6-600 3NTE+1 9 630 30 1 -620 1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= 10 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -22  -6
NS Ranking 90th
 

______________________________________________________________________

47 COLMER v 46 FINIKIOTIS

N-S Bronny & Peter ColmerE-W Frances Lyons & Julianne Rocks
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
254 N-1 4-50 1 N+3 4 -130 -180 -5 60 -3
262 E-1 5 100 4 W+1 10 650 750 13 -650 13
271NTE-3 K 150 4 S-1 J 50 200 5 80 2
281NTE-3 4 150 1NTE-4 5 -200 -50 -2 170 -1
293NTE+1 4-630 4 E+2 4 680 50 2 -980 8
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 4 xS-1 A 200 0 0 110 -7
323 E+2 10-150 5 E= 7 600 450 10 -410 6
331NTN= 4 90 1NTN+1 6 -120 -30 -1 70 1
343 S-1 A-100 3 W= J 140 40 1 -70 -1
353NTE+1 9-630 5 W= 6 600 -30 -1 -620 0
364 E= 10-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  22   17
NS Ranking 60th
 

______________________________________________________________________

48 BUGEIA v 20 KELSO

N-S Noel Bugeia & George StockhamE-W Traian Chira & Laurie Kelso
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+1 4 120 2 N+1 4 -110 10 0 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
274 W-4 2 200 2NTS= Q -120 80 2 80 3
284 S-1 Q-100 1NTE-2 5 -100 -200 -5 170 -7
296NTW= 5-1440 3NTE+1 Q 630 -810 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
311 S+2 K 140 5 xW-2 A -300 -160 -4 110 1
323NTW+1 4-630 2 S-2 J 100 -530 -11 -410 -6
333 N-1 4-50 2 N= 4 -110 -160 -4 70 -3
343 E= A-110 3 W= 3 140 30 1 -70 -1
356 E= 5-1370 5 W+1 J 620 -750 -13 -620 -13
364 E= A-620 4 W= K 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -47  -35
 EW Ranking 8th

______________________________________________________________________

49 GUNNER v 42 HARRIS

N-S Felicity Gunner & Heather MotteramE-W Leonie Clarke & Anne Harris
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N+4 2 150 3NTN= 4 -400 -250 -6 60 3
263NTW+2 2-660 4 W+1 10 650 -10 0 -650 0
272 S+1 3 140 1 S+2 Q -140 0 0 80 2
282 W-2 A 100 1NTE-4 5 -200 -100 -3 170 -2
296 E+1 7-1460 3NTE+1 4 630 -830 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 W-1 6 50 3 W= A 140 190 5 110 -2
323 E+3 5-170 4 E+1 6 150 -20 -1 -410 6
332 N= 4 110 2 N= 2 -110 0 0 70 1
343 W= J-140 3 W+2 3 200 60 2 -70 -2
354 W+1 2-650 6 W= 10 1370 720 12 -620 -1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -4  -6
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

50 RHODES v 69 LEACH

N-S Charles & John McMahonE-W Brian & Carolyn Leach
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-2 4-100 2 E-1 9 -100 -200 -5 60 -4
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
272NTS-1 10-50 1 S+1 Q -110 -160 -4 80 -4
282 W-3 4 150 3 S= Q -140 10 0 170 -1
296NTE-2 7 200 4 E+2 A 680 880 13 -980 15
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 K-200 4 W-2 A -100 -300 -7 110 -7
322 S-2 4-100 3NTW-1 8 -100 -200 -5 -410 7
331NTS+1 K 120 3 N-1 J 50 170 5 70 2
343 W= J-140 4 W-1 3 -50 -190 -5 -70 -2
355 xN-2 10-300 4 E= Q 620 320 8 -620 8
364 xN+1 2 910 4 E= A 620 1530 17 -590 17
Totals  18   32
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

51 BARRIE v 22 CHAN

N-S Keith Barrie & Tim O'LoughlinE-W Robert Bignall & Roger Januszke
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 2-50 1NTN+2 5 -150 -200 -5 60 -3
264 E-1 9 100 4 W+1 5 650 750 13 -650 13
271NTE= K-90 1 S+2 5 -140 -230 -6 80 -5
282 W-2 6 100 3 S= 5 -140 -40 -1 170 -2
295 E+1 A-680 5NTW-1 5 -100 -780 -13 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= K 790 4 S= A -620 170 5 110 12
325 E+1 A-620 5 E= 5 600 -20 -1 -410 -5
332 E-1 10 50 2 N= J -110 -60 -2 70 -1
344 W= 3-420 4 W-1 5 -50 -470 -10 -70 -8
354 W+1 10-650 5 xN-3 5 500 -150 -4 -620 -1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -24   6
NS Ranking =51stEW Ranking 84th

______________________________________________________________________

52 SUNDERASAN v 2 KANETKAR

N-S Ailsa Peacock & Lakshmi SunderasanE-W Pauline Gumby & Warren Lazer
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+1 2 120 3NTN= 4 -400 -280 -7 60 2
264 W+1 5-650 4 E-1 9 -100 -750 -13 -650 0
274 S-3 Q-150 1 S+2 Q -140 -290 -7 80 -6
282 W-2 A 100 3 S= Q -140 -40 -1 170 -2
296 W= 2-1430 6NTW= 6 1440 10 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 4 xS= K -790 -890 -13 110 -5
323 W+3 8-170 2 S-2 J 100 -70 -2 -410 6
332 N= 2 110 1NTN+1 4 -120 -10 0 70 1
342 W+3 3-200 3 S-1 2 100 -100 -3 -70 -4
355 xN-4 7-800 5 W= A 600 -200 -5 -620 -5
364 W= A-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -51  -24
NS Ranking 68thEW Ranking =25th

______________________________________________________________________

53 WALTERS v 66 REYNOLDS

N-S Mark Fairlamb & Margaret WaltersE-W John Lokan & Heather Reynolds
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 2 400 3 E-2 5 -200 200 5 60 8
263NTW+2 10-660 3NTW+2 5 660 0 0 -650 0
271NTE+1 K-120 2 S= 8 -110 -230 -6 80 -5
282 E+1 A-140 2 W+2 10 170 30 1 170 -7
296NTW-2 3 200 4 E+2 Q 680 880 13 -980 15
304 N+1 A 450 4 W-2 7 -100 350 8 450 0
314 xS= A 790 4 xS= 10 -790 0 0 110 12
323 E+1 10-130 3 E+2 5 150 20 1 -410 7
331NTN+1 4 120 1NTS= A -90 30 1 70 2
343 W+1 3-170 3 W= 3 140 -30 -1 -70 -3
355 W+1 10-620 4 W+1 A 650 30 1 -620 0
364 E= 3-620 4 E+1 8 650 30 1 -590 -1
Totals  24   28
NS Ranking 77th
 

______________________________________________________________________

54 STURGUL v 41 BUDAI

N-S Alison & John SturgulE-W Leigh Foran & Theo Mangos
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
255 N-1 4-50 3 E-3 6 -300 -350 -8 60 -3
264 W+1 8-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
272 S= Q 110 3NTN-1 A 50 160 4 80 1
282 S+2 6 170 1NTE-2 5 -100 70 2 170 0
296 W= 6-1430 4 E+2 Q 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 K-200 3 S= K -140 -340 -8 110 -7
323NTW-1 4 100 4 E+1 6 150 250 6 -410 11
331NTS= A 90 1NTN= 4 -90 0 0 70 1
343 W+1 3-170 4 W-1 J -50 -220 -6 -70 -3
354 W+1 10-650 6 E-1 10 -100 -750 -13 -620 -1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -36  -12
 EW Ranking 40th

______________________________________________________________________

55 PACKER v 65 BOYCE

N-S Mimi Packer & Jane ReynoldsE-W Julie Boyce & Christine Thomas
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N+2 5 110 3NTN= 4 -400 -290 -7 60 2
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
274 S-1 Q-50 1 S+1 Q -110 -160 -4 80 -4
284 S-1 Q-100 1NTS+4 3 -210 -310 -7 170 -7
296 E= 4-1430 6NTW= 7 1440 10 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 2 W+1 2 140 40 1 110 -5
322NTW+1 4-150 1NTN-2 J 100 -50 -2 -410 6
331NTN+1 5 120 1NTN+1 4 -120 0 0 70 2
342 W+2 2-170 3 S-1 9 100 -70 -2 -70 -3
355 W= 4-600 5 E-1 3 -100 -700 -12 -620 1
364 E= 8-620 4 E+2 8 680 60 2 -590 -1
Totals -30  -18
NS Ranking 97thEW Ranking 72nd

______________________________________________________________________

56 KITE v 67 LUKE

N-S Helen Kite & Geoffrey ThomasE-W Genevieve Donnelly & Tricia Lonn
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 4-50 3NTN-1 4 50 0 0 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
272 S+1 8 140 2 S-1 Q 50 190 5 80 2
282 W-2 4 100 3 S= Q -140 -40 -1 170 -2
294 E+2 A-680 4 E+2 4 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 6 450 4 N= 3 -420 30 1 450 0
314 S= A 620 3 S= A -140 480 10 110 11
324 E-1 A 100 3 S-3 J 150 250 6 -410 11
332 S= A 110 2 S= A -110 0 0 70 1
344 W-2 3 100 2 W= 3 110 210 5 -70 5
354 E+2 3-680 5 W= J 600 -80 -2 -620 -2
364 E= 8-620 5 xN-3 2 800 180 5 -590 -1
Totals  28   29
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

57 TRUSCOTT v 34 KEFFORD

N-S Carole & John ForemanE-W Ian & Vicky Lisle
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 2 400 1NTN+1 4 -120 280 7 60 8
264 W+1 2-650 3NTW+2 10 660 10 0 -650 0
271 S+1 Q 110 1NTS+1 Q -120 -10 0 80 1
282 S+1 Q 140 1NTS+2 3 -150 -10 0 170 -1
294 E+2 2-680 4NTW+1 3 660 -20 -1 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 3 -450 0 0 450 0
314 W-3 2 150 5 W-2 A -100 50 2 110 1
322 xS-2 J-300 3NTW+2 3 660 360 8 -410 3
332 E= 5-110 2 S= K -110 -220 -6 70 -5
343 W= 4-140 4 W-1 3 -50 -190 -5 -70 -2
354 W+1 4-650 4 E= 3 620 -30 -1 -620 -1
364 E= A-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  4   10
NS Ranking 49th
 

______________________________________________________________________

58 HOLLANDS v 73 ROBERTSON

N-S Gary & Sue HollandsE-W Mike Stratton & Tony Tompkin
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 E-2 9 200 5 N-1 2 50 250 6 60 4
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
272 W-1 6 50 3NTS-2 Q 100 150 4 80 -1
281NTE-4 5 200 4 S= Q -620 -420 -9 170 1
293NTW+1 3-630 4 E+2 A 680 50 2 -980 8
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= K 790 4 S-1 A 100 890 13 110 12
323 E+2 K-150 3 E+2 A 150 0 0 -410 6
332 S= K 110 2 N= J -110 0 0 70 1
343 W= 3-140 2 W+1 3 140 0 0 -70 -2
354 W+1 6-150 5 W= K 600 450 10 -620 10
363 E+1 10-170 4 E= A 620 450 10 -590 9
Totals  36   48
NS Ranking 44th
 

______________________________________________________________________

59 BUTTROSE v 71 TRZESINSKI

N-S Maria Gibbs & Rebecca PoonE-W Evan Allanson & Neil Welch
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN+1 4 150 1NTN+1 4 -120 30 1 60 3
263NTW+2 2-660 4 E+1 A 650 -10 0 -650 0
273 S-1 Q-50 1 S+2 Q -140 -190 -5 80 -4
282 W-2 10 100 1NTS+2 3 -150 -50 -2 170 -2
296 W= 2-1430 6 W= 3 1430 0 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 1 S+2 A -140 -240 -6 110 -5
324 E= A-130 2NTW+1 8 150 20 1 -410 7
332 S+1 A 140 2 N= 10 -110 30 1 70 2
344 W-1 5 50 4 W= Q 420 470 10 -70 3
355 W+1 4-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -620 0
364 E= 10-620 4 E= A 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  1  -7
 EW Ranking 77th

______________________________________________________________________

60 FLEET v 62 HEYWOOD

N-S Helen & Robert FleetE-W Jo-Anne Heywood & Frank Vearing
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN+1 2 150 3 N+1 6 -130 20 1 60 3
263NTW+2 10-660 3NTW+2 2 660 0 0 -650 0
274 S-1 Q-50 3 S= Q -140 -190 -5 80 -4
283 S+1 4 170 2 W-3 10 -150 20 1 170 0
296 W= J-1430 4 E+2 4 680 -750 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
313 S+1 A 170 4 S= A -620 -450 -10 110 2
325 E= 10-600 3 E+2 A 150 -450 -10 -410 -5
332 N= 2 110 2 S= K -110 0 0 70 1
343 W= 3-140 2 W+1 3 140 0 0 -70 -2
355 W= A-650 5 W= 4 600 -50 -2 -620 -1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -38  -17
 EW Ranking 70th

______________________________________________________________________

61 SHILLING v 39 FISHER

N-S Mick Koziol & Paul WalkerE-W Pamela Canning & Michael Curry
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN+1 2 150 2 S= A -110 40 1 60 3
264 W+1 10-650 2NTE+3 5 210 -440 -10 -650 0
274 xS-2 Q-300 2 S+1 Q -140 -440 -10 80 -9
283 S-1 Q-100 4 S= Q -620 -720 -12 170 -7
294 W+2 6-680 4 E+2 K 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 5 -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= K 620 4 xS= A -790 -170 -5 110 11
323 E+2 5-150 2NTW+3 3 210 60 2 -410 6
331NTS+1 6 120 2 E-2 2 -100 20 1 70 2
343 S-1 A-100 3 W+2 4 200 100 3 -70 -1
356 W= 6-1430 4 E= 7 620 -810 -13 -620 -13
364 E= 10-620 4 W+1 K 650 30 1 -590 -1
Totals -42  -2
 EW Ranking 90th

______________________________________________________________________

62 HEYWOOD v 60 FLEET

N-S Jean Barbour & Greg NicholsonE-W Raymond & Rita Jones
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 N+1 6 130 2NTN+1 2 -150 -20 -1 60 2
263NTW+2 2-660 3NTW+2 10 660 0 0 -650 0
273 S= Q 140 4 S-1 Q 50 190 5 80 2
282 W-3 10 150 3 S+1 4 -170 -20 -1 170 -1
294 E+2 4-680 6 W= J 1430 750 13 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 S= A 620 3 S+1 A -170 450 10 110 11
323 E+2 A-150 5 E= 10 600 450 10 -410 6
332 S= K 110 2 N= 2 -110 0 0 70 1
342 W+1 3-140 3 W= 3 140 0 0 -70 -2
355 W= 4-600 5 W= A 650 50 2 -620 1
364 E= 8-620 4 E= 8 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals  38   26
NS Ranking 66th
 

______________________________________________________________________

63 UPSALL v 64 DUNNE

N-S Faye Symons & Denis UpsallE-W Edi Sfreddo & Lori Smith
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 4-50 3 W-3 A -300 -350 -8 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 4 650 0 0 -650 0
272 xS= Q 470 1NTS+1 Q -120 350 8 80 9
283 S= Q 140 4 S-1 6 100 240 6 170 -1
296 W= 2-1430 4 E+1 4 650 -780 -13 -980 -10
304 N= A 420 4 N+1 A -450 -30 -1 450 -1
314 S-1 A-100 4 S-1 A 100 0 0 110 -5
323NTW= 9-600 3 E+1 A 130 -470 -10 -410 -5
332 S= A 110 1NTN+1 10 -120 -10 0 70 1
343 W= 3-140 2 W= J 110 -30 -1 -70 -2
354 E+1 Q-650 6 W-1 4 -100 -750 -13 -620 -1
364 E+2 A-680 3 E+1 8 170 -510 -11 -590 -3
Totals -43  -21
NS Ranking =79thEW Ranking 62nd

______________________________________________________________________

64 DUNNE v 63 UPSALL

N-S Di Dunne & Margaret TaylorE-W Christine Parkin & Ian Wright
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 W-3 A 300 3NTN-1 4 50 350 8 60 6
264 W+1 4-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
271NTS+1 Q 120 2 xS= Q -470 -350 -8 80 1
284 S-1 6-100 3 S= Q -140 -240 -6 170 -7
294 E+1 4-650 6 W= 2 1430 780 13 -980 8
304 N+1 A 450 4 N= A -420 30 1 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 4 S-1 A 100 0 0 110 -5
323 E+1 A-130 3NTW= 9 600 470 10 -410 7
331NTN+1 10 120 2 S= A -110 10 0 70 2
342 W= J-110 3 W= 3 140 30 1 -70 -1
356 W-1 4 100 4 E+1 Q 650 750 13 -620 12
363 E+1 8-170 4 E+2 A 680 510 11 -590 9
Totals  43   32
NS Ranking 15th
 

______________________________________________________________________

65 BOYCE v 55 PACKER

N-S Wendy Hopkins & John SmithE-W Linda Coli & Rose Moore
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 4 400 1 N+2 5 -110 290 7 60 8
264 W+1 10-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
271 S+1 Q 110 4 S-1 Q 50 160 4 80 1
281NTS+4 3 210 4 S-1 Q 100 310 7 170 1
296NTW= 7-1440 6 E= 4 1430 -10 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
312 W+1 2-140 4 S-1 A 100 -40 -1 110 -6
321NTN-2 J-100 2NTW+1 4 150 50 2 -410 7
331NTN+1 4 120 1NTN+1 5 -120 0 0 70 2
343 S-1 9-100 2 W+2 2 170 70 2 -70 -1
355 E-1 3 100 5 W= 4 600 700 12 -620 12
364 E+2 8-680 4 E= 8 620 -60 -2 -590 -3
Totals  30   11
NS Ranking 84th
 

______________________________________________________________________

66 REYNOLDS v 53 WALTERS

N-S Ian Heairfield & Ken NixonE-W Adel Abdelhamid & Gamini Amerasinghe
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253 E-2 5 200 3NTN= 2 -400 -200 -5 60 4
263NTW+2 5-660 3NTW+2 10 660 0 0 -650 0
272 S= 8 110 1NTE+1 K 120 230 6 80 1
282 W+2 10-170 2 E+1 A 140 -30 -1 170 -8
294 E+2 Q-680 6NTW-2 3 -200 -880 -13 -980 7
304 W-2 7 100 4 N+1 A -450 -350 -8 450 -8
314 xS= 10 790 4 xS= A -790 0 0 110 12
323 E+2 5-150 3 E+1 10 130 -20 -1 -410 6
331NTS= A 90 1NTN+1 4 -120 -30 -1 70 1
343 W= 3-140 3 W+1 3 170 30 1 -70 -2
354 W+1 A-650 5 W+1 10 620 -30 -1 -620 -1
364 E+1 8-650 4 E= 3 620 -30 -1 -590 -2
Totals -24   10
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

67 LUKE v 56 KITE

N-S Sally Luke & Genevieve PageE-W Jim Coffey & Glynn Evans
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN-1 4-50 3NTN-1 4 50 0 0 60 -3
264 E= 9-620 4 W+1 10 650 30 1 -650 1
272 S-1 Q-50 2 S+1 8 -140 -190 -5 80 -4
283 S= Q 140 2 W-2 4 -100 40 1 170 -1
294 E+2 4-680 4 E+2 A 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N= 3 420 4 N+1 6 -450 -30 -1 450 -1
313 S= A 140 4 S= A -620 -480 -10 110 1
323 S-3 J-150 4 E-1 A -100 -250 -6 -410 6
332 S= A 110 2 S= A -110 0 0 70 1
342 W= 3-110 4 W-2 3 -100 -210 -5 -70 -1
355 W= J-600 4 E+2 3 680 80 2 -620 1
365 xN-3 2-800 4 E= 8 620 -180 -5 -590 -5
Totals -28   2
 EW Ranking 37th

______________________________________________________________________

68 WEBSTER v 72 ROLLOND

N-S Peter Janes & Ian RamseyE-W Chris Barnwell & Jane Caddy
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 6 120 1 N+3 4 -130 -10 0 60 2
263NTW+2 5-660 4 W+1 10 650 -10 0 -650 0
271 S= 6 80 1NTE-1 K -50 30 1 80 0
284 S= Q 620 2 N-1 A 100 720 12 170 10
296NTE= A-1440 5 E+1 2 680 -760 -13 -980 -10
304 N+1 7 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS= 6 790 5 xS-1 A 200 990 14 110 12
322NTW+1 4-150 5 E= 5 600 450 10 -410 6
332 E-1 9 50 2 S= K -110 -60 -2 70 -1
342 W+2 4-170 3 W+1 Q 170 0 0 -70 -3
355 xN-4 6-800 4 W+1 4 650 -150 -4 -620 -5
364 E+1 A-650 4 W= K 620 -30 -1 -590 -2
Totals  17   9
 
 

______________________________________________________________________

69 LEACH v 50 RHODES

N-S Yvonne Dennis & Sandy LeachE-W Nico Ranson & Christophe Rhodes
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252 E-1 9 100 3NTN-2 4 100 200 5 60 1
264 W+1 10-650 4 E= 9 620 -30 -1 -650 0
271 S+1 Q 110 2NTS-1 10 50 160 4 80 1
283 S= Q 140 2 W-3 4 -150 -10 0 170 -1
294 E+2 A-680 6NTE-2 7 -200 -880 -13 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 W-2 A 100 4 xS-1 K 200 300 7 110 0
323NTW-1 8 100 2 S-2 4 100 200 5 -410 11
333 N-1 J-50 1NTS+1 K -120 -170 -5 70 -3
344 W-1 3 50 3 W= J 140 190 5 -70 3
354 E= Q-620 5 xN-2 10 300 -320 -8 -620 0
364 E= A-620 4 xN+1 2 -910 -1530 -17 -590 -1
Totals -18   18
NS Ranking 99thEW Ranking 37th

______________________________________________________________________

70 CHURCHILL v 74 WATERHOUSE

N-S Val Churchill & Helga CorbettE-W Ruth Chapman & Helene Maddern
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
253NTN= 2 400 2NTN= 4 -120 280 7 60 8
264 W+1 10-650 4 E-1 9 -100 -750 -13 -650 0
271 S+2 Q 140 1NTS+1 Q -120 20 1 80 2
284 S-1 Q-100 2 W-2 4 -100 -200 -5 170 -7
294 E+2 4-680 4 E+2 Q 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
314 xS-1 A-200 3 S+1 A -170 -370 -9 110 -7
323 E+2 A-150 3 E+1 A 130 -20 -1 -410 6
332 E= 9-110 3 S-1 A 50 -60 -2 70 -5
342 W+2 3-170 2 W+2 3 170 0 0 -70 -3
355 W+1 J-620 4 W+1 4 650 30 1 -620 0
363 E+1 10-170 4 E= 8 620 450 10 -590 9
Totals -11   10
NS Ranking 93rd
 

______________________________________________________________________

71 TRZESINSKI v 59 BUTTROSE

N-S Jackie Franco & Georg TrzesinskiE-W Denise Buttrose & Carmel Thompson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251NTN+1 4 120 2NTN+1 4 -150 -30 -1 60 2
264 E+1 A-650 3NTW+2 2 660 10 0 -650 0
271 S+2 Q 140 3 S-1 Q 50 190 5 80 2
281NTS+2 3 150 2 W-2 10 -100 50 2 170 -1
296 W= 3-1430 6 W= 2 1430 0 0 -980 -10
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
311 S+2 A 140 4 S-1 A 100 240 6 110 1
322NTW+1 8-150 4 E= A 130 -20 -1 -410 6
332 N= 10 110 2 S+1 A -140 -30 -1 70 1
344 W= Q-420 4 W-1 5 -50 -470 -10 -70 -8
354 W+1 10-650 5 W+1 4 620 -30 -1 -620 -1
364 E= A-620 4 E= 10 620 0 0 -590 -1
Totals -1  -9
 EW Ranking 63rd

______________________________________________________________________

72 ROLLOND v 68 WEBSTER

N-S Merilyn Paris & Helen RollondE-W Moira Smith & Wendy Webster
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
251 N+3 4 130 2NTN= 6 -120 10 0 60 2
264 W+1 10-650 3NTW+2 5 660 10 0 -650 0
271NTE-1 K 50 1 S= 6 -80 -30 -1 80 -1
282 N-1 A-100 4 S= Q -620 -720 -12 170 -7
295 E+1 2-680 6NTE= A 1440 760 13 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 7 -450 0 0 450 0
315 xS-1 A-200 4 xS= 6 -790 -990 -14 110 -7
325 E= 5-600 2NTW+1 4 150 -450 -10 -410 -5
332 S= K 110 2 E-1 9 -50 60 2 70 1
343 W+1 Q-170 2 W+2 4 170 0 0 -70 -3
354 W+1 4-650 5 xN-4 6 800 150 4 -620 -1
364 W= K-620 4 E+1 A 650 30 1 -590 -1
Totals -17  -15
 EW Ranking 68th

______________________________________________________________________

73 ROBERTSON v 58 HOLLANDS

N-S Gavin Bow & Mike RobertsonE-W Elainne Leach & Leone Moffat
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
255 N-1 2-50 3 E-2 9 -200 -250 -6 60 -3
264 W+1 10-650 4 W+1 10 650 0 0 -650 0
273NTS-2 Q-100 2 W-1 6 -50 -150 -4 80 -5
284 S= Q 620 1NTE-4 5 -200 420 9 170 10
294 E+2 A-680 3NTW+1 3 630 -50 -2 -980 7
304 N+1 K 450 4 N+1 K -450 0 0 450 0
314 S-1 A-100 4 xS= K -790 -890 -13 110 -5
323 E+2 A-150 3 E+2 K 150 0 0 -410 6
332 N= J 110 2 S= K -110 0 0 70 1
342 W+1 3-140 3 W= 3 140 0 0 -70 -2
355 W= K-600 4 W+1 6 150 -450 -10 -620 1
364 E= A-620 3 E+1 10 170 -450 -10 -590 -1
Totals -36   9
NS Ranking 95thEW Ranking =81st

______________________________________________________________________

74 WATERHOUSE v 70 CHURCHILL

N-S Lalita Singh & Mary WaterhouseE-W Alex Bremner & Marijke Genet
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
252NTN= 4 120 3NTN= 2 -400 -280 -7 60 2
264 E-1 9 100 4 W+1 10 650 750 13 -650 13
271NTS+1 Q 120 1 S+2 Q -140 -20 -1 80 1
282 W-2 4 100 4 S-1 Q 100 200 5 170 -2
294 E+2 Q-680 4 E+2 4 680 0 0 -980 7
304 N+1 A 450 4 N+1 A -450 0 0 450 0
313 S+1 A 170 4 xS-1 A 200 370 9 110 2
323 E+1 A-130 3 E+2 A 150 20 1 -410 7
333 S-1 A-50 2 E= 9 110 60 2 70 -3
342 W+2 3-170 2 W+2 3 170 0 0 -70 -3
354 W+1 4-650 5 W+1 J 620 -30 -1 -620 -1
364 E= 8-620 3 E+1 10 170 -450 -10 -590 -1
Totals  11   22
 
 

______________________________________________________________________