ROUND EIGHT

ANOT UNDER LIFE TEAMS

Board by Board Summary

FREQUENCY CHART FOR BOARDS 1 TO 14


Round 8

BdScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNo
1 -460 11   -430 1   -420 1   50 3                      
2 -420 7   -130 1   -100 3   50 2   140 1   150 1                
3 -650 1   -150 2   -130 1   -50 1   100 2   140 1   200 5   300 2          
4 -750 1   -620 1   -600 2   -180 1   -150 3   -140 1   -130 1   -120 1   -100 1   100 2   200 2
5 -200 1   -110 1   -100 1   50 1   100 3   110 6   130 2   150 1          
6 -110 3   -100 1   -90 2   100 4   110 1   200 4   400 1             
7 -300 1   -100 1   170 3   200 2   240 1   620 4   650 4             
8 -450 1   -420 3   -170 4   -150 1   -140 1   -130 2   -110 1   -100 1   50 1   100 1    
9 -600 1   -110 1   -100 2   -50 2   100 4   110 1   200 2   300 2   400 1       
10 -200 1   -170 2   -140 2   -110 1   -100 3   100 1   110 1   140 1   200 3       
11 -490 3   -460 5   -430 5   -400 3                      
12 -800 1   -400 1   -300 2   -200 4   -150 2   -100 2   50 2   150 1   500 1       
13 -170 1   -140 7   -120 1   -110 5   200 1                   
14 -450 11   -300 1   -200 1   -150 1   50 1                   


75 HEALEY v 89 MARTIN

N-S Cynthia Brinkman & Terry HealeyE-W Susan Fitch & Anita Frith
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 3-460 3NTE+2 3 460 0 0 -400 -2
22NTE-3 A 150 4 W= J 130 280 7 -270 9
33 S-1 A-50 4 W-3 5 -300 -350 -8 160 -5
43 W= J-140 3NTE= 7 600 460 10 -260 3
53 N+1 A 130 4 W-2 J -100 30 1 60 2
63 S-2 J-100 3NTW-1 10 -100 -200 -5 70 -5
74 N= 6 620 4 S= 8 -620 0 0 460 4
83 W= 10-110 4 E= 7 420 310 7 -200 3
93 S-1 3-50 4 xS-1 3 100 50 2 80 -4
102 S= A 110 3 xW-1 5 -200 -90 -3 0 3
113NTW+1 4-430 3NTW+3 4 490 60 2 -450 1
122 S-1 2-100 1NTW+2 6 150 50 2 -140 1
132 E+1 2-140      0 -130 0
145 W= 5-450      0 -410 -1
Totals  15   9
NS Ranking =5thEW Ranking 2nd

______________________________________________________________________

76 WARD v 87 HARTLEY

N-S Chris Nettle & Michael WardE-W Ann & William Morgan
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
15 W-1 8 50 3NTE+2 5 460 510 11 -400 10
24 E= 7-420 4 E= 7 420 0 0 -270 -4
34 W-2 4 200 4 W-3 3 -300 -100 -3 160 1
43 W+2 7-150 3NTE= 2 600 450 10 -260 3
53 W= 4-110 2 N+1 A -110 -220 -6 60 -5
63 W= 8-110 1NTW= 6 90 -20 -1 70 -5
72 S+2 10 170 4 S+1 J -650 -480 -10 460 -7
83 W+1 5-130 4 E-1 A -50 -180 -5 -200 2
93 N-1 2-50 3 E-2 8 -200 -250 -6 80 -4
103 W-1 4 100 3 W= 3 140 240 6 0 3
113NTW= 3-400 3NTW+3 4 490 90 3 -450 2
122 N-3 3-300 1NTW-1 6 -50 -350 -8 -140 -4
132 E+1 3-140 2 E= 2 110 -30 -1 -130 0
144 W+1 5-450 4 W+1 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals -10  -9
NS Ranking 20thEW Ranking 9th

______________________________________________________________________

77 GEORGIADIS v 79 SLOAN

N-S Joanne Bakas & Tassi GeorgiadisE-W Kate Pinniger & Carla Sullivan
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 7-460 5 W-1 8 -50 -510 -11 -400 -2
24 E= A-420 4 E= A 420 0 0 -270 -4
34 E= 7-130 4 W-2 5 -200 -330 -8 160 -7
43NTE-2 10 200 2 W+3 4 150 350 8 -260 10
52 N+2 6 130 3 N= 5 -110 20 1 60 2
63NTW-4 K 400 2NTW-2 4 -200 200 5 70 8
74 N+1 6 650 3 S+1 5 -170 480 10 460 5
83 N-2 5-100 4 E+1 7 450 350 8 -200 3
93 E-3 8 300 3NTE-3 10 -300 0 0 80 6
103 S-1 K-100 3 W-2 4 -200 -300 -7 0 -3
113NTW+3 3-490 3NTW+2 4 460 -30 -1 -450 -1
123 E-1 2 50 1 N-1 8 100 150 4 -140 5
132 E= 2-110 2 E= 2 110 0 0 -130 1
144 W+1 5-450 4 W+1 K 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals  9   22
NS Ranking 12thEW Ranking =5th

______________________________________________________________________

78 BROOKS v 84 WOZNICZKA

N-S Bevin Brooks & Ingrid CookeE-W Carolyn & Chris Mroczek
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 7-460 3NTE+2 5 460 0 0 -400 -2
24 E= A-420 4 N-1 A 100 -320 -8 -270 -4
34 W-1 6 100 4 W-2 4 -200 -100 -3 160 -2
41NTE+1 7-120 3 W+1 10 130 10 0 -260 4
51NTN-2 5-200 4 E-3 3 -150 -350 -8 60 -6
63 W-2 A 200 1NTW= 5 90 290 7 70 4
72 N+3 6 200 4 S= 8 -620 -420 -9 460 -6
83 E+1 A-170 2 W+1 A 140 -30 -1 -200 1
93 W-1 8 100 3NTW-1 8 -100 0 0 80 1
103 S-1 A-100 3 S-1 K 100 0 0 0 -3
113NTW+2 5-460 3NTW= 4 400 -60 -2 -450 0
122 N-2 8-200 2NTE+1 2 150 -50 -2 -140 -2
132 E= 2-110 1 xE= 2 140 30 1 -130 1
144 W+1 5-450 5 W= 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals -25  -15
NS Ranking =3rdEW Ranking 14th

______________________________________________________________________

79 SLOAN v 77 GEORGIADIS

N-S Gary Frampton & Dave SloanE-W Sally Fraser & Catherine Thredgold
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
15 W-1 8 50 3NTE+2 7 460 510 11 -400 10
24 E= A-420 4 E= A 420 0 0 -270 -4
34 W-2 5 200 4 E= 7 130 330 8 160 1
42 W+3 4-150 3NTE-2 10 -200 -350 -8 -260 3
53 N= 5 110 2 N+2 6 -130 -20 -1 60 2
62NTW-2 4 200 3NTW-4 K -400 -200 -5 70 4
73 S+1 5 170 4 N+1 6 -650 -480 -10 460 -7
84 E+1 7-450 3 N-2 5 100 -350 -8 -200 -6
93NTE-3 10 300 3 E-3 8 -300 0 0 80 6
103 W-2 4 200 3 S-1 K 100 300 7 0 5
113NTW+2 4-460 3NTW+3 3 490 30 1 -450 0
121 N-1 8-100 3 E-1 2 -50 -150 -4 -140 1
132 E= 2-110 2 E= 2 110 0 0 -130 1
144 W+1 K-450 4 W+1 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals -9   15
NS Ranking =3rdEW Ranking 1st

______________________________________________________________________

80 PORTER v 85 BRADY

N-S Margaret & Roger PorterE-W Chris Brady & Heather Young
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
14NTE+1 A-460 3NTW+2 3 460 0 0 -400 -2
24 E-1 4 50 4 E= A 420 470 10 -270 8
35 N-3 K-150 4 W-2 6 -200 -350 -8 160 -7
44 W= 8-620 4 W-1 J -100 -720 -12 -260 -8
53 W-1 4 50 4 E-2 K -100 -50 -2 60 0
63 W= 10-110 3NTW-1 6 -100 -210 -5 70 -5
72 N+2 A 170 4 S+1 Q -650 -480 -10 460 -7
83 E+1 7-170 3 E+1 7 170 0 0 -200 1
95 W-4 4 400 2NTN-2 Q 100 500 11 80 8
104 W-2 4 200 2 W+2 5 170 370 9 0 5
113NTW+1 4-430 3NTW+2 4 460 30 1 -450 1
123NTW-3 6 150 3 xW-3 A -500 -350 -8 -140 7
132 E+1 2-140 1NTE+1 2 120 -20 -1 -130 0
145 W= 5-450 5 xN-2 9 300 -150 -4 -410 -1
Totals -19   0
NS Ranking 18thEW Ranking 40th

______________________________________________________________________

81 LYNCH v 86 NEUMEISTER

N-S Brian & Sara LynchE-W Tina Koch & David Schofield
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
14 E= 7-420 5 W-1 9 -50 -470 -10 -400 -1
24 E= A-420 4 N-1 A 100 -320 -8 -270 -4
33 E+2 5-150 4 W+1 10 650 500 11 160 -7
43NTE-1 7 100 5 W-2 J -200 -100 -3 -260 8
54 W-2 A 100 2 S+1 A -110 -10 0 60 1
62 N= A 110 3 W-2 A -200 -90 -3 70 1
73NTS-3 3-300 2NTS+4 4 -240 -540 -11 460 -13
84 W= Q-130 4 E-2 2 -100 -230 -6 -200 2
92NTW-2 J 200 3 E= 8 110 310 7 80 3
102 W= 5-110 2 W+1 3 140 30 1 0 -3
113NTW+2 3-460 3NTW+2 4 460 0 0 -450 0
122 N-2 9-200 3 N-3 8 300 100 3 -140 -2
132 E+1 2-140 2 E= 2 110 -30 -1 -130 0
144 W+1 5-450 3 W+2 5 200 -250 -6 -410 -1
Totals -26  -16
NS Ranking 28thEW Ranking 30th

______________________________________________________________________

82 STOKES v 83 HAYLES

N-S Ian Sando & Jane StokesE-W Meredith Coleman & Carolyn Toh
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 3-460 3NTE+1 8 430 -30 -1 -400 -2
24 N-1 A-100 3 N= Q -140 -240 -6 -270 5
33 S= 9 140 4 W-1 6 -100 40 1 160 -1
43 E+2 7-150 2 N-1 7 100 -50 -2 -260 3
52 N+1 6 110 3 N= K -110 0 0 60 2
63 E= 10-110 4 E-1 10 -100 -210 -5 70 -5
74 N+1 6 650 3NTS-1 5 100 750 13 460 5
84 E= A-420 3 E+1 A 170 -250 -6 -200 -6
93 S= 3 110 3 W-1 8 -100 10 0 80 1
103 S= A 140 3 W+1 5 170 310 7 0 4
113NTW+1 8-430 3NTW= 3 400 -30 -1 -450 1
123 N-4 9-400 2 N-2 10 200 -200 -5 -140 -6
132 E-2 2 200 2 E+1 A 140 340 8 -130 8
144 W+1 5-450 4 W+1 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals  3   8
NS Ranking 31stEW Ranking 41st

______________________________________________________________________

83 HAYLES v 82 STOKES

N-S Antonina & Peter HaylesE-W Sue Longstaff & Graham Wilson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+1 8-430 3NTE+2 3 460 30 1 -400 -1
23 N= Q 140 4 N-1 A 100 240 6 -270 9
34 W-1 6 100 3 S= 9 -140 -40 -1 160 -2
42 N-1 7-100 3 E+2 7 150 50 2 -260 4
53 N= K 110 2 N+1 6 -110 0 0 60 2
64 E-1 10 100 3 E= 10 110 210 5 70 1
73NTS-1 5-100 4 N+1 6 -650 -750 -13 460 -11
83 E+1 A-170 4 E= A 420 250 6 -200 1
93 W-1 8 100 3 S= 3 -110 -10 0 80 1
103 W+1 5-170 3 S= A -140 -310 -7 0 -5
113NTW= 3-400 3NTW+1 8 430 30 1 -450 2
122 N-2 10-200 3 N-4 9 400 200 5 -140 -2
132 E+1 A-140 2 E-2 2 -200 -340 -8 -130 0
144 W+1 5-450 4 W+1 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals -3  -2
NS Ranking 34thEW Ranking 42nd

______________________________________________________________________

84 WOZNICZKA v 78 BROOKS

N-S Edward Czarnocki & Les WozniczkaE-W Rodney Macey & Judy Zollo
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 5-460 3NTE+2 7 460 0 0 -400 -2
24 N-1 A-100 4 E= A 420 320 8 -270 5
34 W-2 4 200 4 W-1 6 -100 100 3 160 1
43 W+1 10-130 1NTE+1 7 120 -10 0 -260 4
54 E-3 3 150 1NTN-2 5 200 350 8 60 3
61NTW= 5-90 3 W-2 A -200 -290 -7 70 -4
74 S= 8 620 2 N+3 6 -200 420 9 460 4
82 W+1 A-140 3 E+1 A 170 30 1 -200 2
93NTW-1 8 100 3 W-1 8 -100 0 0 80 1
103 S-1 K-100 3 S-1 A 100 0 0 0 -3
113NTW= 4-400 3NTW+2 5 460 60 2 -450 2
122NTE+1 2-150 2 N-2 8 200 50 2 -140 0
131 xE= 2-140 2 E= 2 110 -30 -1 -130 0
145 W= 5-450 4 W+1 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals  25   12
NS Ranking 7thEW Ranking =10th

______________________________________________________________________

85 BRADY v 80 PORTER

N-S Elaine Kenny & Bea StallbomE-W Helen Gray & Ralph Shaw
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTW+2 3-460 4NTE+1 A 460 0 0 -400 -2
24 E= A-420 4 E-1 4 -50 -470 -10 -270 -4
34 W-2 6 200 5 N-3 K 150 350 8 160 1
44 W-1 J 100 4 W= 8 620 720 12 -260 8
54 E-2 K 100 3 W-1 4 -50 50 2 60 1
63NTW-1 6 100 3 W= 10 110 210 5 70 1
74 S+1 Q 650 2 N+2 A -170 480 10 460 5
83 E+1 7-170 3 E+1 7 170 0 0 -200 1
92NTN-2 Q-100 5 W-4 4 -400 -500 -11 80 -5
102 W+2 5-170 4 W-2 4 -200 -370 -9 0 -5
113NTW+2 4-460 3NTW+1 4 430 -30 -1 -450 0
123 xW-3 A 500 3NTW-3 6 -150 350 8 -140 12
131NTE+1 2-120 2 E+1 2 140 20 1 -130 0
145 xN-2 9-300 5 W= 5 450 150 4 -410 3
Totals  19   16
NS Ranking 43rdEW Ranking 39th

______________________________________________________________________

86 NEUMEISTER v 81 LYNCH

N-S Herb & Marg NeumeisterE-W David Num & Richard Prickett
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
15 W-1 9 50 4 E= 7 420 470 10 -400 10
24 N-1 A-100 4 E= A 420 320 8 -270 5
34 W+1 10-650 3 E+2 5 150 -500 -11 160 -13
45 W-2 J 200 3NTE-1 7 -100 100 3 -260 10
52 S+1 A 110 4 W-2 A -100 10 0 60 2
63 W-2 A 200 2 N= A -110 90 3 70 4
72NTS+4 4 240 3NTS-3 3 300 540 11 460 -6
84 E-2 2 100 4 W= Q 130 230 6 -200 7
93 E= 8-110 2NTW-2 J -200 -310 -7 80 -5
102 W+1 3-140 2 W= 5 110 -30 -1 0 -4
113NTW+2 4-460 3NTW+2 3 460 0 0 -450 0
123 N-3 8-300 2 N-2 9 200 -100 -3 -140 -4
132 E= 2-110 2 E+1 2 140 30 1 -130 1
143 W+2 5-200 4 W+1 5 450 250 6 -410 5
Totals  26   12
NS Ranking 15thEW Ranking 35th

______________________________________________________________________

87 HARTLEY v 76 WARD

N-S Kate Hartley & Peter WilsonE-W Jill Byrne & Sue Ormsby
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 5-460 5 W-1 8 -50 -510 -11 -400 -2
24 E= 7-420 4 E= 7 420 0 0 -270 -4
34 W-3 3 300 4 W-2 4 -200 100 3 160 4
43NTE= 2-600 3 W+2 7 150 -450 -10 -260 -8
52 N+1 A 110 3 W= 4 110 220 6 60 2
61NTW= 6-90 3 W= 8 110 20 1 70 -4
74 S+1 J 650 2 S+2 10 -170 480 10 460 5
84 E-1 A 50 3 W+1 5 130 180 5 -200 6
93 E-2 8 200 3 N-1 2 50 250 6 80 3
103 W= 3-140 3 W-1 4 -100 -240 -6 0 -4
113NTW+3 4-490 3NTW= 3 400 -90 -3 -450 -1
121NTW-1 6 50 2 N-3 3 300 350 8 -140 5
132 E= 2-110 2 E+1 3 140 30 1 -130 1
144 W+1 5-450 4 W+1 5 450 0 0 -410 -1
Totals  10   2
NS Ranking 37thEW Ranking =10th

______________________________________________________________________

88 WALSH v 90 SA YOUTH

N-S Derek Poulton & Nick WalshE-W George Bartley & Jarvis Dunsford
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 3-460 3NTE+2 A 460 0 0 -400 -2
24 E-1 A 50      0 -270 8
34 W-2 4 200      0 160 1
45 xW= 4-750 2NTW+2 10 180 -570 -11 -260 -10
53 N= 5 110 4 N-1 4 100 210 5 60 2
63NTW-1 5 100 4 W-2 2 -200 -100 -3 70 1
74 N= 4 620 2 S+3 Q -200 420 9 460 4
84 E= 7-420 3 W+2 5 150 -270 -7 -200 -6
93NTW-1 9 100 3NTW= J 600 700 12 80 1
10       0 0 0
113NTW+1 4-430 4NTW= 4 430 0 0 -450 1
122 N-2 9-200 3 xN-3 9 800 600 12 -140 -2
132 E+1 2-140 2 E+2 2 170 30 1 -130 0
145 S-3 9-150 4 W-1 5 -50 -200 -5 -410 6
Totals  13   4
NS Ranking 17thEW Ranking 23rd

______________________________________________________________________

89 MARTIN v 75 HEALEY

N-S Robert Martin & Jill SchusterE-W Wing Roberts & John Rogers
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 3-460 3NTE+2 3 460 0 0 -400 -2
24 W= J-130 2NTE-3 A -150 -280 -7 -270 4
34 W-3 5 300 3 S-1 A 50 350 8 160 4
43NTE= 7-600 3 W= J 140 -460 -10 -260 -8
54 W-2 J 100 3 N+1 A -130 -30 -1 60 1
63NTW-1 10 100 3 S-2 J 100 200 5 70 1
74 S= 8 620 4 N= 6 -620 0 0 460 4
84 E= 7-420 3 W= 10 110 -310 -7 -200 -6
94 xS-1 3-100 3 S-1 3 50 -50 -2 80 -5
103 xW-1 5 200 2 S= A -110 90 3 0 5
113NTW+3 4-490 3NTW+1 4 430 -60 -2 -450 -1
121NTW+2 6-150 2 S-1 2 100 -50 -2 -140 0
13       0 -130 0
14       0 -410 0
Totals -15  -3
NS Ranking 16thEW Ranking 29th

______________________________________________________________________

90 SA YOUTH v 88 WALSH

N-S Ben Curtis & Jack McDonaldE-W Steve Briggs & Fred Littmann
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
13NTE+2 A-460 3NTE+2 3 460 0 0 -400 -2
2       0 -270 0
3       0 160 0
42NTW+2 10-180 5 xW= 4 750 570 11 -260 2
54 N-1 4-100 3 N= 5 -110 -210 -5 60 -4
64 W-2 2 200 3NTW-1 5 -100 100 3 70 4
72 S+3 Q 200 4 N= 4 -620 -420 -9 460 -6
83 W+2 5-150 4 E= 7 420 270 7 -200 2
93NTW= J-600 3NTW-1 9 -100 -700 -12 80 -12
101NTS-2 A-200      0 0 -5
114NTW= 4-430 3NTW+1 4 430 0 0 -450 1
123 xN-3 9-800 2 N-2 9 200 -600 -12 -140 -12
132 E+2 2-170 2 E+1 2 140 -30 -1 -130 -1
144 W-1 5 50 5 S-3 9 150 200 5 -410 10
Totals -13  -23
NS Ranking 38thEW Ranking 13th

______________________________________________________________________